English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 52068/87197 (60%)
Visitors : 8909013      Online Users : 111
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/34064

    Title: 以螞蟻、塔布基因為基礎的混合式雞尾酒分群法之探討
    Other Titles: A mix cluster method based on ant genetic and tabu search
    Authors: 朱芳儀;Chu, Fang-yi
    Contributors: 淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士班
    李鴻璋;Lee, Hung-chang
    Keywords: 螞蟻分群法;基因演算法;塔布搜尋法;k均值法;分群效度指標;Ant Colony system;Genetic Algorithm;Tabu Search;K-means;Cluster Validity Index
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 04:51:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 分群是將相似度高的物件分類成群,而分群有許多方法,從傳統的階層式分群法、分割式分群法、密度分群法到應用啟發式演算法在分群上。對於傳統的分群法,例如常見的K-means,使用者需先決定群數,才能進行分群。
    在效能評估方面,我們使用UCI Machine Learning Repository[3]和Gerrild and Lantz[11]所提供的4個資料集,與其他七個分群方法進行比較與評估[2,15]。此外亦利用該資料集,來探討目前提出之分群效度指標,並提出一種新的分群效度指標PBM+ index。
    實驗結果顯示,相較於其他七個分群方法,AGKT皆能非常快速且正確分群。相較於ESTA[15]分群法, AGKT平均約快40倍且分群效度表現上差不多。
    探討分群效度指標方面,我們研究效度指標,分別為:Dunn’s index、Davies Boundin index、PBM index及我們提出的PBM+ index。而實驗證實,4種分群效度指標中,以PBM+ index進行分群得到了較好的分群數與分群結果。
    Clustering is to collect those objects are high similarity into a group, there are many methods to clustering. The common methods of clustering include the traditional hierarchical clustering, partitional clustering, density-based clustering and and application of heuristic clustering algorithms on the cluster. K-means is a kind of traditional clustering methods, users need to decide the cluster number before clustering.
    This research developed an algorithm that can automatically decides the cluster number, called AGKT. It mixed of ant clustering, Gene, K-means and the concept of tabu search algorithm, and explore Cluster validity indexes as to objective functions to compare the performance of the correct rate.
    There are two stages of algorithm: the first stage generated the initial group by ASCA; The second stage find out the best structure and number of cluster with the mask of Gene and k-means, with Cluster validity index.
    In the performance assessment, we compare and estimate with seven other clustering methods [2,15], and use four data sets provided from the UCI Machine Learning Repository[3] and Gerrild and Lantz[11]. In addition, we also make use of these data sets to explore the current cluster validity index, and propose a new index called PBM+ index.
    The results showed that, AGKT can faster and accurate clustering than the seven other clustering methods. Compared to the ESTA [15], AGKT about 40 times faster in the performance of Cluster validity index.
    Discussion on Cluster validity index, we use four Cluster validity index, including: Dunn''s index, Davies Boundin index, PBM index and PBM+ index provided from us. The research confirmed that the four Cluster validity index to PBM+ index has better result.
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback