本研究以我國營造業及建築業為對象，選取2000至2007年之資料，以共同邊界資料包絡分析法探討其生產力變動及效率追趕的情況。主要實證結果如下，首先，建築業之變動規模報酬下共同邊界技術效率及技術缺口比率均顯著大於營造業，而建築業個別產業變動規模報酬下之技術效率則顯著小於營建業。其次，在固定規模報酬假設下之技術效率、共同邊界技術效率及技術缺口比率等指標，建築業與營造業間亦均具顯著差異。其中，建築業之固定規模報酬下之技術缺口比率顯著大於營造業，而建築業固定規模報酬下之技術效率與共同邊界技術效率則顯著小於營造業。其次，建築業的共同邊界生產力變動指數顯著小於營造業，結合建築業具有變動規模報酬較營造業為高之共同邊界技術效率，可知建築業屬於技術效率高且跨期較穩定的情況。至於建築業與營造業技術缺口比率變動率及其組成要素變動的檢定結果方面，建築業與營造業之技術缺口比率變動率間未具顯著差異。綜合而言，本研究以不同生產技術但產業特性類似的營造業及建築業進行生產力變動及效率追趕分析，實證資訊或能提供攸關的資訊予台灣營造業及建築業管理階層之決策參考。 This study discusses the productivity change and efficiency catch-up of/between building and construction industries in Taiwan. The methodology is meta-frontier data envelopment analysis (DEA) and data collected from year of 2000 to 2007. According to the study’s empirical results, the technology gap ratio and meta-frontier technical efficiency at the condition of variance return to scale of building industry is valued higher and significant than construction industry, and group technical efficiency at the condition of variance return to scale of building industry is valued lower and significant than construction industry. Second, building and construction industries are significant of technical efficiency at the condition of variance return to scale, meta-frontier technical efficiency and technology gap ratio. Third, meta-frontier productivity Index of building industry is valued lower and significant than construction industry. According to the result, technical efficiency of building industry is higher and more stable than construction industry. This empirical result can be used as a reference of making decision for the management of accounting firms.
