淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/33456
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 64191/96979 (66%)
Visitors : 8165417      Online Users : 7450
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/33456


    Title: 不實廣告對品牌權益影響之研究 : 以個人道德發展階段為干擾變項
    Other Titles: The influence of deceptive advertisement on brand equity : development stages of morality as a moderator.
    Authors: 陳彥成;Chen, Yen-cheng
    Contributors: 淡江大學企業管理學系碩士班
    洪英正;Hung, Ying-cheng;張瑋倫;Chang, Wei-lun
    Keywords: 不實廣告;品牌權益;道德發展階段;deceptive advertisement;Brand Equity;development stages of morality
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 04:08:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討不實廣告發生後,消費者在不同的道德發展階段下對企業的品牌權益觀感是否有所差異。採取真實驗設計中的隨機化實驗組控制組前後測設計的方法進行研究以瞭解其影響程度。依據Preston(1990, 1994)所提出的不實暗示的廣告類型,將不實廣告分為「驗證的承諾」、「誇張顯著性」、「混淆的呈現」與「省略與無效或不存在的限制條件」四大類型(Petty, Ross, and Kopp, 1995),在實驗設計的過程中對實驗組揭露不實廣告內容,以檢測控制組與實驗組於不實廣告發生後之間的差異。
    以政治大學與淡江大學兩校大學生為研究對象,四種不實類型廣告一共188位實驗受試者,經由相依樣本t檢定、二因子變異數分析、卡方檢定、多變量分析、共變量分析、獨立樣本t檢定與事後檢定等統計分析,得到以下的研究結論與發現:
    一、當消費者認知到一則廣告含有廣告不實的訊息時,則其對刊登該廣告公司的品牌權益觀點會產生顯著影響。
    二、當消費者認知到一則廣告含有廣告不實的訊息時,並不會因道德發展階段的高低,而與其他消費者對該則不實廣告所產生的反應有所差異。換言之,個人道德發展階段之不同並不會干擾對不實廣告所產生的反應。
    三、個人人口統計變項之不同,不會在個人道德發展階段以及其對品牌權益觀點上產生顯著差異。
    根據分析的結果,本研究認為已存在於廣告中所宣稱的事實必須完整呈現於所販賣的商品之上,且存在於廣告上的限制條件必須能清楚引起消費者注意,因「驗證的承諾」與「省略與無效或不存在的限制條件」兩種類型的不實廣告對消費者所造成的負面觀感更甚於「誇大」與「混淆」商品內容的廣告。
    This research probes the influence of the deceptive advertisement on brand equity, and takes development stages of morality as a moderator. Randomized experiment and control groups’ pretest-posttest design was used in this research. We selected four typical types of deceptive advertisement for experiment, including “Promise of Proof“, “Exaggerated Signification”, “Confusing Presentation” and “Omissions and Ineffective or Nonexistent Qualification” (Preston, 1989). We let the experimental group receive the message that the advertisement includes deceptive contents during the experiment process, but the control group did not. Then we test the reaction of their cognition of brand equity by experimental group and control group.
    The final vivid samples are 188 students come from two universities. Through the data analysis, we have gotten the conclusion as below:
    1. When a consumer feel that an advertisement contain deceptive content, the customer-based brand equity will be significant affected.
    2. When a consumer feel that an advertisement contain deceptive content, his development stage of morality does not interfere with his purchasing decision. And that means personal development stage of morality does not have extraneous effect on customer’s cognition of brand equity.
    3. Difference of age and sex do not have significant effect on people’s stages of morality and cognition of customer-based brand equity.
    We also address several practical marketing suggestions depend on the result. The declaration in the advertisement must be completely shown in the sale of goods, and the qualification must clearly attract the attention of customers. Because kinds of “Exaggerated Signification” and “Omissions and Ineffective or Nonexistent Qualification” deceptive advertisement will cause more negative perception than “Exaggerated Signification” and “Confusing Presentation”.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Business Administration] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown395View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback