English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 55184/89457 (62%)
造訪人次 : 10680554      線上人數 : 39
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/33382

    題名: IC零組件通路商與供應商競合行為之研究
    其他題名: A study on the competition and cooperation in IC channel
    作者: 蘇子誠;Su, Tzu-cheng
    貢獻者: 淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班
    洪英正;Hung, Ying-cheng;楊立人;Yang, Li-jen
    關鍵詞: 非零和賽局理論;通路商;IC原廠;競合行為;distributor;IC Manufacturer;co-opetitive Behavior;Nonzero-Sum Game Theory
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2010-01-11 04:00:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究以競合行為之非零和賽局(Non-zero-sum Games)分析IC原廠與通路商的競合關係,引用通路管理文獻Stern and El-Ansary(1972) 通路權力的定義、Morgan and Hunt (1994)提出關係行銷之模式,為理論基礎。由於現今IC通路市場在呈現完全競爭的情況下,IC原廠與通路商的既競爭又合作的互動過程就如同一場賽局。本研究選取兩個事件對通路商與IC原廠進行深度訪談,發展出研究架構。推出主要命題如下:
    命題一: IC通路中原來之通路商會因為穩定之寡佔市場面臨破壞
    命題二: IC通路商之間合作關係之建立在於可以滿足彼此之間的欠
    命題三: IC通路關係中持續保有合作空間的廠商,其生存能力將更
    命題四: IC通路中屬於通用料之零組件,只有掌握關鍵人際關係
    結論: IC通路夥伴關係應從長遠利益思考,勿落入「輸贏」或「雙
    In this study, the nonzero-sum game theory of co-opetitive behaviors is introduced for the competitive relationship between the original IC manufacturers and distributors, while the definition of channel power proposed by Stern and El-Ansary (1972) and the relationship marketing model proposed by Morgan and Hunt (1994) are brought in as theoretical bases. As today’s IC channel market is in a state of total competition, the competitive and yet cooperative interactions between IC manufacturers and distributors are like a game. Two events, for which distributors and IC manufacturers are interviewed in depth, and are selected for the construction of research framework. The following proposituons come up:
    Proposituon 1: The agents in the IC distribution channels will start a cooperative relationship due to possible destruction of market monopoly and entry of potential new entrants.
    Proposituon 2: The cooperation between IC distributors is based on the satisfaction with what one another lacks, what one another needs and what one can provide for one another, thus leading to the dependence on one another as well as a driving force to urge them going in the “win-win” direction.
    Proposituon 3: Those who continuously maintain a room for cooperation in IC distribution channels tend to have stronger survivability and better advantage for development.
    Proposituon 4: For parts and components that are common materials in IC distribution channels, the price quotes become more competitive only if there is a tighter relationship with some key persons.
    Conclusion: An IC channel partnership should aim for the future. Do not position yourself in a “lose-win” or “lose-lose” dilemma. A “win-win” situation only occurs when every partner starts to think for long term.
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系暨研究所] 學位論文


    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數



    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋