English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 49064/83169 (59%)
造訪人次 : 6959254      線上人數 : 53
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/31585


    題名: The determinants of capital structure from partial adjustment and nonlinear empirical evidence
    其他題名: 藉由部分調整模型及非線性實證探討公司資本結構之決定
    作者: 劉文謙;Liu, Wen-chien
    貢獻者: 淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班
    聶建中;Neih, Chien-chung
    關鍵詞: 資本結構;調整速度;目標槓桿;抵換理論;短期結構偏差;動態縱橫資料;縱橫門檻迴歸模型;Capital structure;Speed of adjustment;Target leverage;Trade-off theory;Short time dimension bias;Dynamic panel data;Panel threshold regression model
    日期: 2006
    上傳時間: 2010-01-11 01:00:04 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究主要藉由部分調整模型(partial adjustment model)及縱橫門檻迴歸模型(panel threshold regression model, Hansen, 1999)去探討公司資本結構之決定,檢視主要是支持抵換理論(Trade-off theory)亦或是融資順位理論(Pecking order theory)。此外,吾人認為文獻Flannery and Rangan (2006, JFE)其發現相對於過去文獻中,調整速度相對為快速許多,他們歸因於考慮了公司特性及固定效果;然而,本研究認為資本結構調整速度相對快很多之因,應出自於短期結構偏差(Short time dimension bias)。雖然他們選擇以工具變數法(Instrumental variable, IV)來解決動態縱橫資料(Dynamic panel data)之問題,但實證上要選取考慮完善之工具變數並不容易。因此,吾人在考慮樣本選取偏差(Sample selection bias)及短期結構偏差(Short time dimension bias)之間的抵換關係下,藉由建構及比較平衡式(Balanced)及非平衡式(Unbalanced)的縱橫資料。可發現於公司資本結構之決定,抵換理論之行為確實存在,且公司大致上約需四年可調整至其目標資本結構,此調整速度相對文獻Flannery and Rangan (2006)之發現較為慢。另外,吾人又發現公司資本結構之調整行為,其調整速度分別在高負債及低負債區間為較快的,而在中間負債區間則相對較為慢。另外,在運用縱橫門檻迴歸模型分析結果部份,得到之結果亦為支持抵換理論。綜合言之,抵換理論之行為於資本結構之決定確實存在,但吾人卻不可斷言只存在此行為。
    In this study, we investigate at whether the pecking order or trade-off theory is functional by means of applying the partial adjustment model and panel threshold regression model (Hansen, 1999). In addition, we argue that the adjustment speed is faster than other literatures in Flannery and Rangan (2006, JFE) partially because of the problem of time dimension bias in short panels, not all resulting from the complete considerations of firm characters and fixed effects. Although they use the instrumental variables to reduce these problems, choosing a good instrumental variable is not quite easy. Therefore, we construct two sets of unbalanced and balanced panel datasets as the consideration of trade-off relation between sample selection and time dimension bias. We find that trade-off theory is functional and firms close about one-fourth of the gap between its target and actual leverage in one year which is slower than Flannery and Rangan (2006). As estimating our sample in different regimes of leverage, we can find that the patterns of adjustment towards its target leverage are faster and stronger in the lowest and highest regimes of leverage, slower and weaker in the middle percentile of leverage. Furthermore, the results of panel threshold regression model are also consistent with the trade-off theory. In short, the trade-off theory is valid, but we can not assert it is the whole story for the decision of corporate capital structure.
    顯示於類別:[財務金融學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    0KbUnknown502檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋