English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49523/84737 (58%)
Visitors : 7606495      Online Users : 86
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/31503


    Title: 臺灣上市公司獨特性波動風險對股票報酬關係之研究
    Other Titles: The relations between idiosyncratic volatility risk and stock return in Taiwan stock market
    Authors: 林曉梅;Lin, Hsiao-mei
    Contributors: 淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班
    邱忠榮;Chiou, Jong-rong;林允永;Lin, Yun-yung
    Keywords: 系統風險;市場價值;淨值市價比;獨特性風險;Beta;Market value;Idiosyncratic Volatility Risk;Panel Data
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 00:50:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 報酬與風險一直為投資人所關切的議題。本研究依據Fama and French(1992)的三因子模型為研究模型的基本架構,加入近年來波動性研究都將其重心擺在其上的獨特性波動風險因子,本文使用過去未討論過的GARCH(1,1)配置三因子殘差變異數作為獨特性波動風險因子,形成四因子資本資產定價模型,試探討此四因子模型對於股票報酬的關聯性。本研究方法以Panel data模型進行分析研究,將檢定結果加以比較三因子模型與四因子模型是否有何差異。
    本研究結果顯示:在三因子模型中,所有風險因子皆為顯著且具有解釋能力;而四因子資本資產定價模型中,加入了獨特性波動風險因子,所有變數仍然皆為顯著且具有解釋能力,並且四因子模型的判定係數較三因子模型高,因此可以得知,四因子模型的配適能力較三因子模型好,並且獨特性波動風險因子存在於台灣股票市場,對於股票報酬可以更具有解釋能力,此為一新貢獻。
    與被解釋變數的關聯性方面,研究結果得知貝它係數與淨值市價比對股票報酬率呈現負向關係,而規模效果與股票報酬率為正向關係,其與過去文獻的結果有不同的論調,然而,這可能是因為資料本質的不同、選取時間的長度不同、亦或是研究方法的不同,因而產生不同的影響。而新解釋變數─獨特性波動風險因子與股票報酬率為正向關係,表示獨特性的波動越大,則股票報酬率將會越高,此與過去研究發現有相同的結果。
    In this paper we follow Fama and French (1992). We employ the common three risk factors in Fama and French (1992) and take another new risk factor- Idiosyncratic Volatility Risk (called IVR) in our model. We want to know the relationship among these four risk factors and the stock return and compare the results of the three-factor model with the four-factor model. We analyze our empirical data with Panel Data model. The sample period is from 1996 to 2006. In summary, all factors are significant in explaining stock returns in the three–factor model. In the four-factor modal, even we take IVR in our model; all risk factors are still significant in explaining stock returns. Moreover, the in the four-factor modal is higher than in the three–factor model. In this paper, we find there is negative relation between Beta (or BE/ME) and stock return. Besides, we find there is positive relation between Market value and stock return. The other factor-IVR has positive relation with stock return as well. Our result is the same with the result from Chiang (2003).This is, the higher the idiosyncratic volatility of the Taiwan listed stocks is, the higher the return of the Taiwan listed stocks increases.
    Appears in Collections:[財務金融學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown202View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback