English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51771/86989 (60%)
Visitors : 8368206      Online Users : 76
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/31344

    Title: Super3技能融入國小一年級國語文閱讀教學之發展設計
    Other Titles: Integrating super3 skill into teaching reading of elementary school
    Authors: 洪玉婷;Hong, Yu-ting
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班
    陳慶帆;Chen, Chin-fan
    Keywords: Super3;閱讀教學;Reading teaching
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 00:33:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 資訊暴漲,知識擴充,網路世界無遠弗屆,閱讀成為適應未來生活的重要能力,能善用閱讀能力累積知識,解決面臨的問題,閱讀不僅只是閱讀,其牽涉學習者問題解決能力。本研究參考Super3技能設計閱讀教學活動,期望學習者能透過閱讀解決問題。
    Super3乃由Eisenberg 和 Berkowitz提出計畫、執行、檢核階段,將原本Big6的六大階段按次序濃縮為三個階段,更適合本研究對象國小一年級學生作為解決問題之用。前置階段,運用故事文法圖分析6W及QAR策略以設定混雜問題、發問問題及學習單引導學生進行思考;計畫階段以腦力激盪對混雜問題進行討論與思辯作為開端;執行階段採用發問策略引導學生思考作為閱讀過程;最後的檢核階段運用自我檢核及同儕互評檢視學習成效及學習成品。
    With explosive information and extensive knowledge, cyber world is infinite, reading become an essential skill to cope with future life. Learners accumulate knowledge by reading to solve the up against problems. Reading is not only reading itself, but also including the capability of problem solving. The main purpose of this study was referring to Super3 skills for designing reading activities, and hoping learners can solve the problems by reading.
    Super3 was abbreviated from Big6 and comprises three stages: “plan”, “do” and “review” which was suggested by Eisenberg and Berkowitz for developing young learners’ problem solving abilities. This action research studied the first grade students for four months. Reading was the main theme; reading related picture books were the material, assigning a multiple topic based on students’ prior experience for conducting students’ thinking. “Plan” stage began with the strategies of brainstorming. “Do” stage applied four categories of guided thinking questions as reading process. “Review” stage used self-evaluation and peer-evaluation for reviewing the performance and outcome.
    This study found that the learners'' prior knowledge and environment must be confirmed in advance. In classroom discussion, teachers don''t comment children''s opinions, teachers guide children step by step that help children''s thinking. On the other hand, learners'' performances, the "right here" decided by learners'' spelling ability at first, and get the proficiency gradually; the "thinking and searching" easily confused by literal meaning; the "writer and me" needs teachers'' guiding of diverse standpoints thinking;the self conditions of the "shrink or swim" can revised by peers, and reinforced the statements with exist experience. Review needs teachers'' explanations and demonstration first to avoid learners'' preference and prejudice.
    Appears in Collections:[教育科技學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback