淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/31294
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62797/95867 (66%)
Visitors : 3732439      Online Users : 324
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/31294


    Title: 國小教師與家長對於教師評鑑認知比較之研究
    Other Titles: A comparison study on the perception of teacher evaluation between elementary school teachers and parents
    Authors: 高惠敏;Kao, Hui-min
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班
    高熏芳;Kao, Hsun-fung
    Keywords: 教師評鑑;教師評鑑標準;Teacher Evaluation;teacher evaluation standard
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 00:29:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 教師是教育改革成敗的關鍵性角色,教育改革的內涵與焦點隨著社會變遷與多元而受到各界重視,特別是教師素質與教育品質之間的關係。為了促進教師的專業成長與工作效能,目前國內有許多學者已積極的投入教師評鑑方面的研究,而教育主管機關也著手進行相關的改革。然而一個完善的教師評鑑制度,必須透過多方面的溝通與討論,方能獲得所有利害關係人的肯定。綜觀近年來國內教師評鑑相關之研究,網羅了教育主管機關、教育行政人員、師資培育機構、基層教師的意見與看法,卻少有家長的意見表達,過去有不少教育改革要求增加父母參與教育活動的機會,賦予家長的更多的權力作決定。本研究試著從家長和國小教師的觀點,來比較兩者對於教師評鑑的整體看法包含教師評鑑的目的、評鑑的標準、評鑑人員的組成、教師評鑑的時機、評鑑方式與評鑑結果之運用等,以作為教育行政機關規劃相關政策與學校實施教師評鑑之參考。
    本研究針對國小教師代表發出60份問卷,回收有效問卷39份,有效回收率為65﹪,家長代表發出85份問卷,回收有效問卷54份,有效問卷回收率63﹪,調查所得資料以描述性統計、t考驗、χ2 考驗等統計方法進行資料分析。
    本研究的結果如下:
    一、教師和家長都強調以專業發展為導向的形成性評鑑。
    二、教師重視的評鑑標準有班級經營與學習氣氛的營造、教學活動的實施、教學規劃與設計,而家長則重視品德與操守及服務熱忱。
    三、教師認為以學科、學年教師代表參與教師評鑑的制訂與實施可行性最高;家長則認為教育專業團體比較合適。
    四、家長和教師都認為以專業成長紀錄、及利害關係人的意見作為蒐集資料的來源較為可行。
    五、教師傾向二年實施一次教師評鑑,家長則是每學期一次。
    六、教師和家長一致認為比較可行的獎勵方式為公開表揚,並針對表現不佳的教師提供輔導教師協助。
    七、教師認為評鑑結果應當以書面告知當事人,而家長則認為應該公佈給他們知道。
    八、家長和教師對於整個教師評鑑的看法,仍然非常顯著的差異。
    Teachers play the vital and valuable role in the education reforms. Teacher evaluation has been viewed as an important tool for supporting and improving the quality of teaching but one of the primary means of ensuring a quality educational program for students. In order to promote professional growth and the instructional effectiveness of teachers, many scholars have positively involved this field and so as educational authorities. Teacher evaluation systems should reflect the fundamental importance of effective communication in every aspect to obtain stakeholders’ support. However, amount of studies on teacher evaluation in recent years show the opinions on teacher evaluation of educational authority, school administrator, teacher education institutions, individual teachers but parents. Indeed all participants need to involve in the design and implementation of evaluation system in order to ensure the successful implementation. However, parents too often are excluded from the important phase discussion.
    The purpose of this study is to compare the perception on the teacher evaluation between elementary teachers and parents, that include why teacher evaluation is proceeding, what performance standards are, who should join the program, when to evaluate, how to collect the performance data and how to use the evaluation report. It is expected to realize the opinions both of teachers and parents.
    There were 39 valid respondent questionnaires out of 60 from elementary teachers, with 65% rate of return, and 54 valid respondent questionnaires out of 85 from parents, with 63% rate of return. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test and Chi-square test.
    The main conclusions of this study were as follows:

    1.Teachers and parents agree that the primary purpose of teacher evaluation is for professional development.
    2.Teachers value professional practice standards like classroom management, instructional delivery and planning and preparing for instruction. Parents value professional standards like moral and ethic and professional attitude.
    3.Teachers think that the appropriate people to establish and implement evaluation practice is representative of teachers; but parents prefer education profession organization.
    4.The feasible way for collecting evaluation information is form professional report and stakeholder’ opinions.
    5.Teachers think the appropriate time for evaluation is once two year; but parents think once a semester.
    6.The best rewarding is to praise them publicly.
    7.Teachers think that evaluation reports should be given to appraisee privately, but parents insist that they have right to know.
    8.There are significant differences on the viewpoints on teacher evaluation system between teachers and parents.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Educational Technology ] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown298View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback