階層分析法(AHP)在臺北市國民中學優質教育指標系統之應用研究

機構典藏 > College of Education > Master's Program, Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Leadership > Thesis > Item 987654321/31197

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/31197

Title:	階層分析法(AHP)在臺北市國民中學優質教育指標系統之應用研究
Other Titles:	階層分析法(AHP)在台北市國民中學優質教育指標系統之應用研究 A research on quality education indicators of junior high school performance in Taipei City
Authors:	林美娟;Lin, May-jen
Contributors:	淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士班吳政達;Wu, Cheng-ta
Keywords:	階層分析法;優質教育指標;校務評鑑;analytic hierarchy process(AHP);quality education indicators;school evaluation
Date:	2005
Issue Date:	2010-01-11 00:23:05 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在透過國內外相關文件之分析，參酌各主要國家建立中等學校表現指標的經驗，利用階層分析法並考量臺北市教育制度的現況與特性，提出合理正確的臺北市國民中學學校優質指標，供臺北市國民中學校務評鑑重要資訊提供，供決策者進行整體教育決策之參考。另外，針對臺北市國民中學學校優質指標系統之應用，提出研究結果與討論，依次進行國民中學教育目標與內涵分析、優質指標概念之分析、校長與教師意見之分析等，連結優質教育指標之共構與應用，以統整臺北市國中優質評鑑指標系統。一、結論： 1. 用階層分析法幫助我們明瞭，目前校長與教師對教育政重視之優先順序。 2. 反應臺北市國民中學九年一貫實施情況。 3. 回饋各校對教育指標等政策執行之成效。二、建議： 1. 教育行政機關應將優質教育指標發展納入長期計畫，積極推動優質教育指標政策之應用，並發展「教師有效教學」綜合性指標為首要。 2. 將國民中學學校優質指標列入學校本位校務發展計畫，運用指標提升有效教學、檢視九年一貫學力表現之進展，協助學校朝向優質教育發展。 3. 實成立專責單位並編列預算支援優質教育指標之研究。 The goals of this study are to utilize Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), consider the present situation and character of educational system at Taipei City and offer the reasonable and correct “Quality school indicators” of junior high schools at Taipei City through literature analysis and referring to the experiences how they set up performance indicators of middle school in other countries. The results of research are for school evaluation at Taipei City and policymakers as reference. In addition, this study proposes the research results and discussions for application of excellent school indicators system of junior high schools at Taipei City. This study analyzes educational goals and connotations of junior high schools, the conception of excellent indicators, and the opinions of principals and teachers etc in order. This study integrates every educational indicators and application with excellent evaluation indicators system of junior high schools at Taipei City. Conclusion: 1.The study adopted Analytic Hierarchy Process to realizedthose principals and teachers the priority ranking for educational policy for the current. 2.To reflected the implementation of Nine-year Integrated Curriculum in Taipei Junior high school. 3.The feedback implementation of educational policy in Taipei Junior high school. Suggestion: 1.Application of research results：is for educational administrative authorities. They should make long term plans of school development according to each indicator,and engaged in promoting teachers’teaching at first. 2.Each school should regard “quality school educational indicators” as school basic development program.They should use the indicators of administrators,students and parents and stride forward the goal of excellent school 3.Practical application： further should establish the professional of organization educational indictors system,and compare with excellent educational indictors system and budget of this study.
Appears in Collections:	[Master's Program, Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Leadership] Thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
	0Kb	Unknown	257	View/Open

Loading...