English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 49064/83169 (59%)
造訪人次 : 6955522      線上人數 : 80
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/31197


    題名: 階層分析法(AHP)在臺北市國民中學優質教育指標系統之應用研究
    其他題名: 階層分析法(AHP)在台北市國民中學優質教育指標系統之應用研究
    A research on quality education indicators of junior high school performance in Taipei City
    作者: 林美娟;Lin, May-jen
    貢獻者: 淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士班
    吳政達;Wu, Cheng-ta
    關鍵詞: 階層分析法;優質教育指標;校務評鑑;analytic hierarchy process(AHP);quality education indicators;school evaluation
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2010-01-11 00:23:05 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在透過國內外相關文件之分析,參酌各主要國家建立中等學校表現指標的經驗,利用階層分析法並考量臺北市教育制度的現況與特性,提出合理正確的臺北市國民中學學校優質指標,供臺北市國民中學校務評鑑重要資訊提供,供決策者進行整體教育決策之參考。
    另外,針對臺北市國民中學學校優質指標系統之應用,提出研究結果與討論,依次進行國民中學教育目標與內涵分析、優質指標概念之分析、校長與教師意見之分析等,連結優質教育指標之共構與應用,以統整臺北市國中優質評鑑指標系統。

    一、結論:
    1. 用階層分析法幫助我們明瞭,目前校長與教師對教育政重
    視之優先順序。
    2. 反應臺北市國民中學九年一貫實施情況。
    3. 回饋各校對教育指標等政策執行之成效。
    二、建議:
    1. 教育行政機關應將優質教育指標發展納入長期計畫,積極推
    動優質教育指標政策之應用,並發展「教師有效教學」綜合性指
    標為首要。
    2. 將國民中學學校優質指標列入學校本位校務發展計畫,運用
    指標提升有效教學、檢視九年一貫學力表現之進展,協助學校朝
    向優質教育發展。
    3. 實成立專責單位並編列預算支援優質教育指標之研究。
    The goals of this study are to utilize Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), consider the present situation and character of educational system at Taipei City and offer the reasonable and correct “Quality school indicators” of junior high schools at Taipei City through literature analysis and referring to the experiences how they set up performance indicators of middle school in other countries.
    The results of research are for school evaluation at Taipei City and policymakers as reference.
    In addition, this study proposes the research results and discussions for application of excellent school indicators system of junior high schools at Taipei City. This study analyzes educational goals and connotations of junior high schools, the conception of excellent indicators, and the opinions of principals and teachers etc in order. This study integrates every educational indicators and application with excellent evaluation indicators system of junior high schools at Taipei City.

    Conclusion:
    1.The study adopted Analytic Hierarchy Process to
    realizedthose principals and teachers the priority
    ranking for educational policy for the current.
    2.To reflected the implementation of Nine-year
    Integrated Curriculum in Taipei Junior high school.
    3.The feedback implementation of educational policy in
    Taipei Junior high school.

    Suggestion:
    1.Application of research results:is for educational
    administrative authorities. They should make long term
    plans of school development according to each
    indicator,and engaged in promoting teachers’teaching
    at first.
    2.Each school should regard “quality school
    educational indicators” as school basic development
    program.They should use the indicators of
    administrators,students and parents and stride forward
    the goal of excellent school
    3.Practical application: further should establish the
    professional of organization educational indictors
    system,and compare with excellent educational indictors
    system and budget of this study.
    顯示於類別:[教育政策與領導研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    0KbUnknown206檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋