English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51258/86283 (59%)
Visitors : 8007665      Online Users : 59
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/31106

    Title: 澳洲高等教育品質保證機制之研究 : 以澳洲國立大學與墨爾本大學為例
    Other Titles: Quality assurance mechanism in Australian higher education : the case study of Australian national university and university of Melbourne
    Authors: 洪曉玉;Hung, Hsiao-yu
    Contributors: 淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士班
    楊國賜;Yang, Kuo-shih
    Keywords: 高等教育;品質保證機制;澳洲國立大學;墨爾本大學;Higher education;Quality Assurance Mechanism;Australian National University;University of Melbourne
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 00:14:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討澳洲高等教育品質保證機制之發展,並以澳洲國立大學與墨爾本大學為案例作深入分析,分析後提出建議,以作為我國高等教育建立品質保證機制之參考。

    This purpose of this study is to investigate the development of “Quality Assurance Mechanism in Australian Higher Education”, and to analyze that how the quality assurance mechanisms work in “Australian National University” and “University of Melbourne”. After analyzing the cases, propose practical suggestions for the establishment of quality assurance mechanism in Taiwan higher education.
    This study mainly, via the method of document analysis and case study, aims to explore the meaning of higher education review and quality assurance system in higher education. Besides that this study analyzes unique quality assurance mechanism in the main countries of the world. To clearly realize how to work and develop the improvement plan for quality assurance mechanism in “Australian National University” and “University of Melbourne”.
    Therefore, the main findings of this study are described as below:
    1.The condition of “Quality Assurance Mechanism in Australian Higher Education”:
    1.1On the whole, the relationship between “Quality Assurance Mechanism in Australian Higher Education” and “Australian Higher Education System” was really close together.
    1.2According to the analysis of “Quality Assurance Mechanism in Australian Higher Education”, the most important thing is that the quality was reviewed by an independent non-government unit.
    1.3 The process of “Quality Assurance in Australian” was synergy and integrative.
    1.4 It pays attention to the improvement of competitiveness and internalization, which becomes the largest export country of education all over the world.
    2. The focus of “Higher Education Quality Assurance Mechanism in Australian National University and University of Melbourne” includes the six points: (1) to emphasis on effectiveness of management; (2) to set the independent unit which is responsible for the review of quality; (3) to focus on teachers’ professional knowledge and ability; (4) to create the unique quality culture; (5) to establish the framework which related to the development of quality assurance mechanism; (6) to set the guideline of quality review.
    Based on the above findings, this study concluded with some practical suggestions to educational administrative authorities and higher education institutions in Taiwan.
    Appears in Collections:[教育政策與領導研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback