English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51317/86412 (59%)
Visitors : 8179389      Online Users : 75
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/30963

    Title: 美中戰略經濟對話 : 2006-2008
    Other Titles: Sino-U.S. strategic economic dialogue : 2006-2008
    Authors: 蘇佳年;Su, Chai-nien
    Contributors: 淡江大學美國研究所碩士班
    詹滿容;Chan, Mignonne
    Keywords: 美國;中國;戰略經濟對話;國際建制;U.S.;China;Strategic Economic Dialogue;international regime
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-01-11 00:06:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 基於對美中間經濟互動日益深化與擴大,本文焦點在於探討五次美中戰略經濟對話(Strategic Economic Dialogue)中,哪些因素反映雙方在負責任的利害關係人概念下,做長期性的建設性合作。藉由應用國際建制理論三個學派—現實、新自由、認知學派(school of realist, school of neoliberal, and school of cognitivism)之論述,本文試圖從它們找出最具解釋力的學派。

    Motivated by the concern about the importance of strategic interaction of Sino-U.S. relations, the author would probe into its long term strategic cooperation with the perception of responsible stakeholder, and the factors accounting for the international regime theory. Through the application for the schools of realist, neoliberal, and cognitivism under international regime theory, the author attempts to figure out which school accounts the most for on this topic: Sino-U.S. Strategic Economic Dialogue from 2006 to 2008.

    After analyzing Sino-U.S. Strategic Economic Dialogue from 2006 to 2008, we find out that the school of neoliberal accounted the most among these three schools for this topic in which U.S. and China engage with a long-term constructive cooperation under the principle of responsible stakeholders. U.S. and China both acknowledge that boost comprehensive engagement by strengthening their capabilities by the concept of self-interest is the most priority on each side, even though their agenda setting on SED are still driven by the distribution of power and actions epistemic community can take. Consequently, Sino-U.S. SED can illustrate its multiple collaborations on both sides via policy coordination, multilateral channel arrangement, and shared understanding by corresponding to macroeconomic cooperation, market access, and sustainable development.
    Appears in Collections:[美國研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback