English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49350/84014 (59%)
Visitors : 7262542      Online Users : 67
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/30542

    Title: 中共「經美制臺」戰略之研究(1995.6~2008.3) : 以薄富爾「間接戰略」理論分析
    Other Titles: China's strategy of "containing Taipei through Washington" (1995.6-2008.3) : an analysis based on beaufre's "indirect strategy" theory.
    Authors: 張淑慧;Chang, Shu-hui
    Contributors: 淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士在職專班
    施正權;Shih, Cheng-chuan
    Keywords: 間接戰略;經美制台;薄富爾;Indirect Strategy;Containing Taipei Through Washington;André;Beaufre
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-01-10 23:45:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中共在進行鬥爭時,強調凡事要抓主要矛盾,既然「台灣問題」主要矛盾係分裂與反分裂,故其認為只要解決「台獨」,即可抓住「台灣問題」核心,而關鍵則在於中美關係良窳。尤其在1995、1996年台海危機後,深刻體認美國干預台海問題之決心與實力,自知當下未具備與美國抗衡力量,同時明白唯有和平與穩定國內外環境,方有利推動大陸現代化發展。因此,逐步發展出「經美制台」戰略思維。緣於中共戰略重點是以加強經營與美關係,來達到「制台」目的,與薄富爾「間接戰略」理論中,強調運用非軍事手段,及將衝突以外地區作為決勝戰場等概念相符。故本研究是以薄富爾「間接戰略」理論為分析工具,藉以檢證中共「經美制台」戰略。
    The Chinese Communist Party has always insisted on holding main contradictory when engaging in political struggle. Since secession and anti-secession were China’s major contradictories in dealing with Taiwan issue, China believes that it could seize the core of the issue by resolving Taiwan-independence concern. In this resolving process, US-Taiwan relations is the key. Seeing America’s determination and strength in tackling Taiwan problems, especially from the lessons of Taiwan Strait crises, China knew its limitations of balancing against the U.S. Meanwhile, China comprehended that stable domestic and foreign environments contribute to its modernization. It accordingly developed a “Containing Taipei through Washington” strategy. The strategy aimed at restraining Taiwan through enhancing US-China relations, and this approach parallels André Beaufre’s “indirect strategy,” which emphasized that victory should be won by paralyzing the adversary through non-military action. Thus, the author tries to adopt Beaufre’s theoretical basis to verify China’s strategy.
    This thesis has five chapters. Chapter one explains western strategist’s understanding of strategy, including the traditional definition and Beaufre’s theory that strategy is a method of thought. Further, the author elaborates relations between “total strategy” and “indirect strategy” in Beaufre’s studies, clears up differences between Beaufre’s “indirect strategy” and B.H. Liddell Hart’s “indirect approach,” and researches into the connotation of “indirect strategy.” In chapter two, the author introduces historical background of China’s “Containing Taipei through Washington” strategy and studies how the strategy was formed. Later in chapter three, significant elements in Beaufre’s theory, such as “indirect pressure,” “spiritual strength,” and “exterior maneuver,” would be introduced. Chinese leaders’ cognition of the strategy is also discussed. Fourthly, the author attempts to analyze China’s substantial approaches (e.g. political, economic, psychological and military) in materializing the strategy with Beaufre’s “exterior maneuver,” which serves as the central thought of his “indirect strategy” theory. Finally, with regard to China’s strategic actions to carry out “Containing Taipei through Washington” strategy, the author would make an effort to evaluate consequence, both in positive and negative facets.
    Appears in Collections:[國際事務與戰略研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback