English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 49189/83570 (59%)
造訪人次 : 7089042      線上人數 : 57
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/30188


    題名: 海峽兩岸犯罪問題之研究 : 以侵害智慧財產權為例
    其他題名: A study of cross-strait crimes : taking intellectual property rights infringement as an example
    作者: 黃茂穗;Huang, Mao-sui
    貢獻者: 淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士班
    張五岳;Chang, Wu-ueh
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2010-01-10 23:26:19 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著海峽兩岸交流日趨頻繁,以往兩岸輕忽的侵害智慧財產權犯罪型態,現更因犯罪集團手法翻新,朝向兩岸分工趨勢,再加上兩岸法令差異及意識型態不同,致使侵害智慧財產權之犯罪型態成為跨海犯罪模式,演為兩岸犯罪追查之漏洞,更讓兩岸蒙上國際智慧財產權犯罪溫床之惡名。

    然現今兩岸處於分治狀態,惟智慧財產權具國際性和變遷性,經常受到大眾傳播、科技發展與國際因素之影響,故無論兩岸如何閃避智慧財產權之司法權管轄問題,亦無法自外於對岸之發展和影響,因之如何研究出適合兩岸的司法互助模式,共同打擊兩岸侵害智慧財產權之犯罪,已成為兩岸互動中亟待解決之課題。

    本文之研究將分為五章,茲就各章節論述之重點分述如下:

    第一章 緒論:闡明本文之研究動機、研究方法、研究目的、相關名詞解釋、研究範圍、研究限制、研究流程、研究架構及預期研究成果。

    第二章 兩岸智慧財產權發展趨勢與重要問題:探討何謂智慧財產權、兩岸智慧財產權產生背景、司法保護制度之沿革、發展及保護現況、WTO架構下兩岸智慧財產權保護制度之比較等重要問題。

    第三章 兩岸侵害智慧財產權犯罪之比較:就侵害智慧財產權犯罪特性比較及兩岸侵害智慧財產權行為、處理侵害智慧財產權問題之相關程序及機構、執法之特點及困難、作一分析比較。

    第四章 兩岸現階段司法互助最適模式探討:探討兩岸司法互助之現況及種類、必要性及可行性、衍生性問題、困境探討、並以兩岸司法互助應有之範圍、應堅守之原則的思考下,提出兩岸現階段司法互助最適之理想模型及展望作為兩岸執法機關之參考。

    第五章 結論與建議:綜合研究所得,以期建立兩岸共同保護智慧財產權具體共識,同步加強兩岸執法人員交流及情資回饋機制,俟時機成熟再協商簽署兩岸跨區司法互助之協議並建立對口單位之聯繫管道,再擴展國際合作管道以建立兩岸完善的智慧財產權保護體系為本研究之重心。
    With the frequency connections for both sides, the types of IPR infringement, we’re used to neglected, towards to the tendency of dividing labor and join, owing to the evolution of the crime. In addition, the difference of regulation and ideology are the reasons why IPR infringement will become the cross-straits crime mode and loophole of law enforcement. Moreover than that, let the cross-straits are notorious for seminary of IPR infringement.

    Owing to internationalization and transition of IPR, often influenced by factors of mass communications and technology development, no matter what differences we may have and how much effort trying to neglect the jurisdiction issue we’ve already involved. How to figure out the best way of judicial mutual assistance for both sides and try to fight with IPR infringement it’s more like an unsolved equation.

    The thesis is divided into five chapters as following:

    Chapter One: Introduction-to interpret motives, approaches, goals, interpretation, scope, limitation, procedures, structure and fruitful results of the research.

    Chapter Two: Tendency and critical issues of IPR for both sides-to discuss the background of IPR for both sides, evolution, development and currency of judicial system, comparison IPR protection under WTO structure for both sides.

    Chapter Three: Comparison of IPR infringement for both sides- to analyze types of IPR, characteristics of IPR infringement and the typology of IPR infringement for both sides, to discuss procedures and organizations which are dealing IPR issues, characteristics and difficulties of law enforcement,

    Chapter Four: Discussion of currency and the best model of judicial mutual assistance for both sides-to discuss types, necessity, feasibility, difficulties of judicial mutual assistance for both sides, to come up with an ideal model and prospect of judicial mutual assistance with a view to the scope and principle of judicial mutual assistance for law enforcement reference.

    Chapter Five: Conclusion and suggestion-the recommendations of the research would like to suggest are as following: to build a common consensus for IPR protection, to reinforce the interaction of law enforcement and feedback of the information-exchanging, to sign an agreement of judicial mutual assistance and set up the connections for protecting IPR issue in the long run.
    顯示於類別:[中國大陸研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    0KbUnknown178檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋