淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/27285
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62822/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4016260      Online Users : 570
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/27285


    Title: The Risk of Historical Artefacts in Travel: The Construction of Risk in the International Travelling Exhibition
    Authors: 賴嘉玲;Lai, Chia-ling
    Contributors: 淡江大學未來學研究所
    Date: 2006-09-01
    Issue Date: 2009-12-15 14:19:53 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
    Abstract: This article interrogates the risk of historical artefacts in travel, emphasising especially on the construction of the risk of boundary-crossing when museum exhibits travel abroad through “outbound” international travelling exhibitions. This follows the history of a controversial exhibition, the “Splendour of Imperial China”– held in 1996 that travelled from the National Palace Museum in Taipei which is renowned for its abundant and unique Chinese art collection to one of the most prominent museums on the global stage – the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Drawing upon Mary Douglas's analysis of danger/risk and classification, this paper argues that the risk within the “outbound” international travelling exhibition is less ontological than constructed. Often the controversy over the risk re-delineates the boundary between “us” and “them”. This article, first of all, examines the power-laden relationship, regulated by the struggle of the global museum field, when museum experts at home and abroad co-write the risk of an exhibition's travel in the language of insurance calculation. Second, it analyses the laymen's protesting discourses against the historical artefacts' overseas travel through outbound international travelling exhibition. The protest which appropriated the “keeping-while-giving” logic of exchange, and backed up with both national sentiments and international symbolic sources, rendered the exhibition a hot potato. Finally, it interrogates how the settled outbound travelling exhibition actually renders the museum collection reclassified and revalorized according to their suitability for overseas travel.
    Relation: Journal of Historical Sociology 19(3), pp.266-283
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2006.00282.x
    Appears in Collections:[Master's Program, Graduate Institute of Futures Studies] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML82View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback