本文旨在探討婦女應徵高等教育教職的過程中,是否存在雙重審核標準,因而低估了婦女的能力與成就。本研究係採分層隨機抽樣法,將十份虛擬的履歷表及問卷寄給台灣地區33 所大專院校11 個系所的現任與前任的系主任,及現任系教評會委員。實証研究結果顯示,當應徵者資歷完全相同時,性別並不構成聘任的關鍵因素。本研究對象中之教評會委員的各項特質,包括學歷、年資、職別等,對於應徵人員的判斷及選擇,亦無一致的影響趨向。 The focus of the investigation was gender-based discrimination at the resume-evaluation stage of the hiring process. A set of ten fictitious job resumes, along with a survey questionnaire was mailed to selected current department chairs, former chairs, and professors in the 11 fields of study in 33 higher educational institutions in Taiwan. The result showed that no gender differences were found in rating the applicant’s hirability when both genders had identical academic qualifications. Moreover, the selected respondent characteristics in this study did not show a consistent pattern of strong gender preference in faculty hiring in the resume-evaluation stage.
關聯:
淡江人文社會學刊=Tamkang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2,頁1-22