English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 49117/83224 (59%)
造訪人次 : 7031566      線上人數 : 61
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/26084


    題名: How Should Animals Be Treated?
    作者: Lee, Jack
    貢獻者: 淡江大學通識與核心課程中心
    日期: 2008-06
    上傳時間: 2009-12-15 12:43:51 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Taylor & Francis
    摘要: Tom Regan's four explanations of animal rights are examined and rejected as inadequate. A superior interest based account of animal rights is proposed. This derives an animal's right to freedom from harm from interests that are implicit in the conscious life of the animal.

    According to Tom Regan, there are four possible accounts for dealing with the issue of how animals should be treated: (1) the ‘Kantian account’; (2) the ‘cruelty account’; (3) the ‘utilitarian account’; and (4) the ‘animal rights account’ (Regan, 2001 Regan, T. 2001. “Animal rights, humans wrongs”. In Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, Edited by: Zimmerman, ME, Callicott, JB, Sessions, G, Warren, KJ and Clark, J. 41–55. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    , pp. 41–55). In this paper I propose to briefly survey these four accounts and argue for a fifth view, the ‘interests account’, which I believe is the most reasonable of the five accounts.
    關聯: Ethics, Place and Environment 11(2), pp.181-189
    DOI: 10.1080/13668790802252363
    顯示於類別:[通識與核心課程中心] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML48檢視/開啟

    在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋