English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49287/83828 (59%)
Visitors : 7156264      Online Users : 70
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/26066


    Title: 麥肯能的噤聲論證
    Other Titles: MacKinnon's Silencing Argument
    Authors: 鄭光明;Cheng, Kuang-ming
    Contributors: 淡江大學通識與核心課程中心
    Keywords: 色情權利;德渥肯;麥肯能;麥肯能的噤聲論證;麥肯能的假設;A right to pornography;Ronald Dworkin;Catharine MacKinnon;MacKinnon's silencing argument;MacKinnon's assumption
    Date: 2006-09
    Issue Date: 2009-12-15 12:42:57 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 中央研究院歐美研究所
    Abstract: 我們有色情權利嗎?此為自由主義者與部分女性主義者爭論不休的問題之一。對此,麥肯能 (Catharine MacKinnon) 著名的「噤聲論證」(the silencing argument),實為值得深入探究的論證之一。依麥肯能的噤聲論證,色情刊物使婦女的言論變得沒有價值,並對婦女產生了「噤聲」(silence) 的效果,因此侵害了婦女的言論自由權利。本文將對麥肯能的噤聲論證中「噤聲」的可能意義作仔細考察。本文將主張:麥肯能的噤聲論證是不假思索的把「遭到噤聲」和「言論自由權利遭到侵害」劃上等號 (本文將稱此為「麥肯能假設」),而這其實是很有問題的假設。因此,麥肯能並未成功說服我們為何色情刊物侵害了婦女的言論自由權利。
    Relation: 歐美研究 36(3),頁427-463
    Appears in Collections:[通識與核心課程中心] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML39View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback