淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/25990
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 62805/95882 (66%)
造访人次 : 3932308      在线人数 : 479
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/25990


    题名: Must we know what we mean ?
    作者: 鄭光明;Cheng, Kuang-ming
    贡献者: 淡江大學通識與核心課程中心
    日期: 2005-12-01
    上传时间: 2009-12-15 12:38:21 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Kriterion
    摘要: In his 1987 article “Indeterminacy, Empiricism and the First Person”, John Searle argues that we actually know what we mean; therefore, W. V. O. Quine’s thesis of the indeterminacy of translation must be wrong. In this paper, I will try to identify the mistakes in Searle’s criticism of Quine’s story. I will argue that Quine’s indeterminacy thesis can be construed as containing two theses— that is, the immanent indeterminacy and the transcendent indeterminacy. With these two indeterminacies in mind, Quine’s indeterminacy thesis will still remain tenable even if we actually know what we mean
    關聯: Kriterion 19, pp.21-33
    显示于类别:[通識與核心課程中心] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML159检视/开启
    Must we know what we mean.pdf195KbAdobe PDF0检视/开启

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈