淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/23891
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62816/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 3995970      Online Users : 630
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/23891


    Title: Simple monopoly price theory in a spatial market
    Authors: 許松根;Hsu, Song-ken
    Contributors: 淡江大學產業經濟學系
    Keywords: D42;R32
    Date: 2006-08-01
    Issue Date: 2009-11-30 17:57:51 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Springer
    Abstract: One of main conclusions drawn by prior studies is that in a spatial market, the shape of the demand function can fully determine whether one simple pricing policy is superior to another either on the basis of the firm’s preference or social desirability while there is one assumption that is generally stipulated, namely, that the fixed market area assumption under which the market area is exogenously determined and remains the same under alternative pricing policies. In order to fully understand the impact of a demand function, this paper attempts to reexamine the relative economic advantages between two simple spatial pricing policies in a world with variable market area, that is, the market area is endogenously determined the price charged. We show that the fixed market area assumption is valid only where demand is linear, but no longer holds where demand is nonlinear. Moreover, and more importantly, we show that in a world with variable market area, some conclusions drawn by prior studies on the relative economic benefits of two pricing policies cannot remain valid. The main conclusion of this paper is that even the relative economic benefits of two simple spatial pricing policies is concerned, the impact of economic space is significant.
    Relation: Annals of Regional Science 40(3), pp.531-544
    DOI: 10.1007/s00168-006-0075-5
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Industrial Economics] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown290View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML68View/Open
    Simple monopoly price theory in a spatial market.pdf186KbAdobe PDF2View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback