English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51756/86973 (60%)
Visitors : 8360965      Online Users : 116
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/21649


    Title: 決策中有關加權及評分的若干問題
    Other Titles: Some problems in decision-making concerning weighting and grading
    Authors: 盛慶琜;Sheng, C. L.
    Contributors: 淡江大學管理科學研究所
    Keywords: 決策;加權;評分;評分制度;選擇性的屬性;decision-making;weighting;grading;marking system;optional attribute
    Date: 1994-11-01
    Issue Date: 2009-11-30 13:36:01 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北縣淡水鎮 : 淡江大學商學院暨管理學院
    Abstract: 本文之目的為用一簡單而現實的評鑒例子以說明決策中非必要的或選擇性的屬性之加權問題及應採用何種評分方法之判定問題。從例子可知如將選擇性的屬性之權重計及會對一可能選擇不利,則可不必將此屬性計及。另一結論為對不同屬性可使用不同之評分方法。若一屬性之測度係數量性者,則五分評分法似為適切。但若一屬性之測度係品質性者,則百分法似更為適切。所舉之例子顯示對是否計及選擇性的屬性和是否用五分法或百分法於一評鑒其品質性的屬性等各種不同情況會獲得不同的價值和選擇。
    The purpose of this paper is to study the weighting problem of an optional attribute and the grading problem of justifying the use of marking systems in decision-making, through the illustration by a realistic problem of assessment. 1t is concluded from the example that the weight of an optional attribute should not be counted if the counting of it is diadvantageous to the alternative. It is also concluded that different grading or marking systems may be used for different attributes. If an attribute is measured by quantity, then the fíve-point scale seems appropriate, whereas if an attribute is measured by quantity, then the percentage marking system seems more appropriate. The example shows very different values and choices for different situations regarding whether or not an optional attribute is counted and whether a five point scale or a percentage grading system is used for a quality- type attribute.
    Relation: 第二屆兩岸管理科學研討會論文集,頁131-145
    Appears in Collections:[管理科學學系暨研究所] 會議論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML83View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback