English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51510/86705 (59%)
Visitors : 8266155      Online Users : 105
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/20725


    Title: A comparison of usual indices and extended TOPSIS methods in mutual funds' performance evaluation
    Authors: Lin, Jyh-jiuan;Chiang, Miao-chen;Chang, Ching-hui
    Contributors: 淡江大學統計學系
    Keywords: multiple criteria analysis;mutual fund;performance evaluation;TOPSIS
    Date: 2007-12-01
    Issue Date: 2009-11-30 12:57:50 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: New Delhi: TARU Publications
    Abstract: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the performance of mutual funds. ‘Treynor Ratio’, ‘Sharpe Ratio’, ‘Information Ratio’ and ‘Jensen’s Alpha’ are four commonly used indices for evaluating the competing mutual funds. However, it is not clear which measure is the most robust. This paper not only focuses on investigating the four indices (criteria) separately but also combining all the indices at the same time in making a final ranking of the mutual funds. In this work, the extended TOPSIS with four objective weighing choices under Minkowski’s Lλ metric with λ=2 (Euclidean) distance measure are adopted for the multi-criteria decision making. The aforementioned four usual indices and the extended TOPSIS with four choices of weight methods are then applied to evaluate the performance of 82 Taiwanese mutual funds for 34 consecutive months. Roughly speaking, all the indices perform pretty well in terms of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Although multicriteria methods are not noticeably more accurate than uni-criteria methods, but it offers an alternative to whom wants to take all four criteria into consideration simultaneously.
    Relation: Journal of Statistics & Management Systems 10(6), pp.869-883
    DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2007.10701289
    Appears in Collections:[統計學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML206View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback