淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/20339
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 58286/91808 (63%)
造访人次 : 13825483      在线人数 : 59
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/20339


    题名: 專業與非專業投資人股票購買決策之判斷政策與品質:透鏡模型之應用
    其它题名: The Judgment Policy and Quality of Investment Decision by Professional and Non-professional Investors: An Application of Lens Model
    作者: 顏信輝;蘇勇志
    贡献者: 淡江大學會計學系
    关键词: 透鏡模型;判斷政策;判斷品質;投資判斷;Lens Model;Judgment Policy;Judgment Quality;Investment Judgment
    日期: 2006-04-01
    上传时间: 2013-04-17 11:29:17 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 臺北市:中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會
    摘要: 投資人使用資訊之方式與其投資判斷品質之良窳,直接影響證券市場之發展與效率性。本研究採實驗法,基於透鏡模型之架構探討並比較我國專業與非專業投資人之判斷政策與判斷品質。受試者包括99位基金經理人或研究員,與258位券商從業人員,研究之主要發現如下:(1)在判斷政策上,不論專業與非專業投資人都是採線性之判斷政策,也就是對於各項資訊之意義係獨立解釋,尤以專業投資人更具線性判斷之特徵。在資訊使用上,專業投資人較傾向採結構清單之策略,亦即只仰賴少數重要資訊即形成判斷,焦點較為集中;而非專業投資人則傾向採平衡式的策略,會兼顧所有資訊,焦點較為分散。(2)在判斷品質上,不論由穩定性、共識或自我洞察三個指標,專業投資人的確較非專業投資人展現較佳之判斷品質,而且二者之差異均達到顯著水準。(3)投資經驗對專業投資人之判斷政策與共識均具影響力,但對非專業投資人則無顯著影響,此說明專業投資人較可由經驗中學習。
    The judgment policy and quality of investors' decision directly relate to the efficiency and development of security market. Based on lens model, this paper designed an experiment to explore the judgment policy and quality for professional and nonprofessional investors and to compare their difference. According to the response from 99 mutual fund managers as well as researchers, and 258 employees of security companies, the main results of this study are as follows: (1) Both the professional and nonprofessional investors adopted linear judgment policy, especially for the professional investors. In addition, the professional investors used structured checklist strategy to treat information, that is, they focused on little information only. On the other hand, the nonprofessional investors used balanced strategy. (2) All of the judgment quality indicators (i.e., stability, consensus, and self-insight) consistently showed that professional investors have better performance than nonprofessional investors. (3) Experience variable is significantly for professional investors, but not for nonprofessional investors. It seems that only professional investors can learn form experience.
    關聯: 證券市場發展季刊 18(1),頁 63-105
    DOI: 10.6529/RSFM.2006.18(1).3
    显示于类别:[會計學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML157检视/开启
    index.html0KbHTML50检视/开启
    專業與非專業投資人股票購買決策之判斷政策與品質:透鏡模型之應用.pdf3708KbAdobe PDF0检视/开启

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈