An empirical examination of competing theories to explain the framing effect in accounting-related decisions

doi:10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.35

淡江大學機構典藏 > 商管學院 > 會計學系暨研究所 > 期刊論文 > Item 987654321/20226

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/20226

題名:	An empirical examination of competing theories to explain the framing effect in accounting-related decisions
作者:	Chang, C. Janie;Yen, Sin-hui;Duh, Rong-ruey
貢獻者:	淡江大學會計學系
日期:	2002-01-01
上傳時間:	2009-11-30 12:38:12 (UTC+8)
出版者:	American Accounting Association
摘要:	The purposes of this study are to explore framing effects in a managerial accounting decision context and to test the explanatory power of prospect theory and two competing theories, fuzzy‐trace theory and probabilistic mental models, on such effects. In Experiment 1, 86 undergraduate students made a choice between two alternatives in a managerial decision problem that illustrates a classic, Asian disease‐type business scenario. Results show that the subjects committed the framing effect bias and that prospect theory, fuzzy‐trace theory, and probabilistic mental models all predict the bias. In Experiment 2, a business variant of the Asian disease problem was designed to distinguish among the explanatory abilities of these theories in an accounting context. One hundred eighty‐five undergraduate students participated in the experiment. Results of Experiment 2 indicate that the fuzzy‐trace theory provides additional power to explain the framing effect. Hence, accounting professionals can design better approaches to reporting/presenting financial information that will help managers alleviate the framing effect in decision making.
關聯:	Behavioral research in accounting 14, pp.35-64
DOI:	10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.35
顯示於類別:	[會計學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
		0Kb	Unknown	360	檢視/開啟
index.html		0Kb	HTML	121	檢視/開啟

在機構典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

TAIR相關文章

資料載入中.....