An empirical examination of competing theories to explain the framing effect in accounting-related decisions

doi:10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.35

淡江大學機構典藏 > 商管學院 > 會計學系暨研究所 > 期刊論文 > Item 987654321/20226

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/20226

题名:	An empirical examination of competing theories to explain the framing effect in accounting-related decisions
作者:	Chang, C. Janie;Yen, Sin-hui;Duh, Rong-ruey
贡献者:	淡江大學會計學系
日期:	2002-01-01
上传时间:	2009-11-30 12:38:12 (UTC+8)
出版者:	American Accounting Association
摘要:	The purposes of this study are to explore framing effects in a managerial accounting decision context and to test the explanatory power of prospect theory and two competing theories, fuzzy‐trace theory and probabilistic mental models, on such effects. In Experiment 1, 86 undergraduate students made a choice between two alternatives in a managerial decision problem that illustrates a classic, Asian disease‐type business scenario. Results show that the subjects committed the framing effect bias and that prospect theory, fuzzy‐trace theory, and probabilistic mental models all predict the bias. In Experiment 2, a business variant of the Asian disease problem was designed to distinguish among the explanatory abilities of these theories in an accounting context. One hundred eighty‐five undergraduate students participated in the experiment. Results of Experiment 2 indicate that the fuzzy‐trace theory provides additional power to explain the framing effect. Hence, accounting professionals can design better approaches to reporting/presenting financial information that will help managers alleviate the framing effect in decision making.
關聯:	Behavioral research in accounting 14, pp.35-64
DOI:	10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.35
显示于类别:	[會計學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
		0Kb	Unknown	362	检视/开启
index.html		0Kb	HTML	124	检视/开启

在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

TAIR相关文章

数据加载中.....