English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 49433/84388 (59%)
Visitors : 7446720      Online Users : 83
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/12843

    Title: 論勞思光先生之基源問題研究法
    Other Titles: On Sze-kwang Lao's "Fundamental-question Method"
    Authors: 高柏園
    Contributors: 淡江大學中國文學學系
    Keywords: 基源問題;設準;理論還原;優先性;fundamental question;postulate;theoretical reduction;supremacy
    Date: 1994-06
    Issue Date: 2013-04-17 11:30:13 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市:東方人文學術研究基金會•中國哲學研究中心
    Abstract: 勞思光教授在其《中國哲學史》中,提出「基源問題研究法」作為中國哲學史的研究方法,此誠為一重要的方法論主張。基源問題研究法實乃綜合了發生研究法、系統研究法及解析研究法,再配合其特有之基源問題及設準而完成。不幸的是,基源問題研究法既無法提供尋找基源問題及設準的客觀程序,同時其設準的提出也缺乏周延性,此為其主要的缺失。本文即在說明此義,並提出進一步的建議。
    Ill his History of Chinese Philosophy, Prof, Sze-kwang Lao maintains that the "fundamental-question method" &.& K-Wt.-fk is the best approach to the history of Chinese philosophy. The "fundamental-question method" consists of two parts: one is a synthesis of genetic, systematic, and analytic method, and the other includes fundamental-questions and postulates. But Lao offers no practical methodology for locating the fundamental questions and postulates or for legitimizing those postulates ,This is the major problematic of his "fundamental-question method".
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1021-3732_12p57-78.pdf389KbAdobe PDF155View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback