English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 65231/98744 (66%)
Visitors : 31949987      Online Users : 3696
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/127543


    Title: Cost-effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients: a nationwide population-based propensity score-matched cohort study
    Authors: Chung, Yu-Chien;Kao, Yi-Wei;Huang, Yen-Chun;Chen, Pei-En;Liao, Shu-Chen;Liu, Chih-Kuang;Chen, Mingchih
    Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus;Newly diagnosed diabetes;Diabetic retinopathy;Screening
    Date: 2024-05-19
    Issue Date: 2025-07-22 12:05:46 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Elsevier
    Abstract: Aims
    This study investigated the association between the frequency of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) versus the development of DR and corresponding medical expenses among patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
    Methods
    This longitudinal, population-based study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2004 to 2020) as a data source. Propensity score matching (PSM) (sex, age, comorbidities and concurrent medication use) was employed in the grouping of T2DM patients according to different frequency of DR screening. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients who developed DR, who received DR treatment, and the associated medical expenses and hospitalizations.
    Results
    The 17-year cohort included 337,046 patients. After PSM, three groups each containing 35,739 patients were assembled and analyzed. Compared to low-frequency screening, high-frequency screening was more effective in detecting patients requiring treatment; however, the net cost for treatment was significantly lower. Standard-frequency screening appears to provide the best balance in terms of DR detection, diagnosis interval, the risk of DR-related hospitalization, and DR treatment costs.
    Conclusions
    In this real-world cohort study covering all levels of the healthcare system, infrequent screening was associated with delayed diagnosis and elevated treatment costs, while a fundus screening interval of 1–2 years proved optimal in terms of detection and medical expenditures.
    Relation: Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology 13(3), 100071
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100071
    Appears in Collections:[人工智慧學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML157View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback