淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/126474
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 64185/96959 (66%)
Visitors : 11515517      Online Users : 9094
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/126474


    Title: Aligning common prosperity with sustainable development goals 3 and 7 through sustainable insurance
    Authors: Zhou, Wei;Li, Xuelian;Lin, Jyh-Horng;Chang, Chuen-Ping;Cai, Yujie
    Keywords: Cap-and-trade;Common prosperity;Gini coefficient;Sustainable development goals;Sustainable insurance
    Date: 2024-11-05
    Issue Date: 2024-11-13 12:05:19 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Energy Economics
    Abstract: This paper develops a capped-call option model to evaluate sustainable insurance for achieving common prosperity. It integrates policyholder protection (Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3)) and the cap-and-trade mechanism (SDG 7) in modeling the Gini coefficient, thereby connecting SDGs 3 and 7 with common prosperity. The main findings are as follows. Life insurance policies that prioritize saving features enhance policyholder protection (SDG 3) but can detract from common prosperity. This impact is magnified when the regulatory cap within the cap-and-trade scheme for carbon-intensive manufacturers becomes stricter. High investment risks for carbon-intensive manufacturers reduce policyholder protection but support common prosperity. A stricter cap-and-trade scheme (SDG 7) also reduces policyholder protection and contradicts common prosperity. This paper avoids concluding any inherent inconsistency between the SDGs and common prosperity, as our analysis is based on the structure-conduct-performance paradigm rather than a macro perspective. Policymakers should carefully balance objectives between SDG 3 and common prosperity to ensure that policies promoting individual security do not compromise broader societal well-being and economic equality, as outlined by the SDGs.
    Relation: Energy Economics 140, 108033.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108033
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of International Business] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML44View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback