淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/125249
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 64182/96956 (66%)
Visitors : 11199518      Online Users : 20821
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/125249


    Title: A move analysis of Chinese L2 student essays from the sociocognitive perspective: Genres, languages, and writing quality.
    Authors: Chang, Tzu-Shan
    Date: 2023-07
    Issue Date: 2024-03-11 12:05:30 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
    Abstract: Academic writing can be laborious for Chinese L2 undergraduates, not to mention that assessing their work is challenging and complex. While the linguistic features of Chinese undergraduate writing have been reidentified to be different in recent studies, experimental research on move analysis through the lens of contrastive rhetoric offers insights of Chinese students’ approaches to fulfilling the rhetorical requirements in writing. From the sociocognitive perspective, this study investigated Chinese students’ essays across genres and languages, focusing on moves/steps in introductions and their relation to essay quality. 264 essays by L2 novice writers were statistically analyzed. Results reveal that most participants’ writings gradually adopted elements of English academic writing, but they hybridly structured essays across genres and languages. Only 25.7% of the essays contained the three primary moves necessary for introductions and received the highest scores. Irrespective of language or genre, 80.3% stated essay’s purpose in introductions, but 19.7% did not. More than one-third of the participants began narrative essays with extensive descriptions of topic background, a feature of Chinese writing; such an opening strategy led to the essays not academically valued, especially when thesis and gap were not identified. The research findings hold implications for academic writing teaching and assessment.
    Relation: Assessing Writing 57, 100750
    DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100750
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of English] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML92View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback