English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62830/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4106098      Online Users : 887
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/123285


    Title: 簡單克利金法於臺灣PM2.5資料之應用
    Other Titles: Spatial Prediction for Taiwan PM2.5 Data by Simple Kriging
    Authors: 張雅梅;何昱儒;鄧敏琪
    Keywords: PM2.5;空氣汙染;空間預測;簡單克利金法;穩健迴歸;最小絕對值壓縮和篩選算法;PM2.5;air pollution;spatial prediction;simple kriging;robust regression;least absolute shrinkage and selection
    Date: 2022-09
    Issue Date: 2023-04-28 17:33:12 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 中國統計學社
    Abstract: 本篇研究針對臺灣2017年1月份與2月份的PM2.5資料進行預測,以Huang et al.(2018)所提出的模型為基礎,該模型利用多解析度樣條基底函數(multiresolution spline basis functions)作為迴歸模型的解釋變數,並使用穩健迴歸(robust regression)來對參數進行估計,空間相依性則假設為指數(exponential)函數,最後透過簡單克利金法(simple kriging)做空間預測。本文於該模型中增加基底函數,並考慮新增兩個氣候因子,改以最小絕對值壓縮和篩選算法(least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, Lasso)來對參數進行估計,試圖比較出哪種模型的預測效果較佳。根據研究結果顯示,我們提出的模型於預測能力上並無明顯的差異,但模型增加兩個氣候因子有助於加強模型的預測能力。
    In this study, we try to predict Taiwan PM2.5 data in January and February, 2017. We modify the model proposed by Huang et al. (2018). Their model used the multiresolution spline basis functions as the explanatory variables, and robust regression to estimate the parameters. The spatial dependence is assumed to be exponential. Then the spatial prediction is obtained by using the simple kriging method. For improving prediction accuracy, we consider increasing the number of the basis functions and adding two climate factors. Besides, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) is used to estimate the parameters instead. We compare the prediction performances of few different models. The results show there is no significant differences between these models but adding two climate factors can improve prediction accuracy.
    Relation: 中國統計學報 60(3), p.162-177
    Appears in Collections:[統計學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML46View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback