English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 60868/93650 (65%)
造訪人次 : 1147002      線上人數 : 6
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/120846

    題名: Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of science-based target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation-Evidence from Japan
    作者: Kuo, Lopin;Chang, Bao-Guang
    關鍵詞: Climate change;Science-based target;Internal carbon pricing;Carbon management reputation;High carbon emission industry;Japan
    日期: 2021-07
    上傳時間: 2021-06-11 12:10:19 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Elsevier
    摘要: Under national climate change countermeasures, some Japanese firms have set science-based targets (SBT) for carbon emission to achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2°C. Some scholars proposed that by implementing an internal carbon pricing (ICP) strategy, firms can prepare themselves for the uncertainties of external carbon pricing in advance. Can Japanese firms effectively utilize these practical carbon management tools (strategies) (i.e., SBT and ICP) to enhance their carbon management reputation (CMR)? CMR can be regarded as an important indicator of low-carbon competitiveness in future international trade. So far, this topic has never been explored. Based on this perspective, this study focuses on the period of 2016–2019 after the Paris Agreement went into effect. The full samples consist of 1,994 Japanese firms using ordinal logistic regression. The empirical results indicate that, overall, Japanese sample firms which set SBT or implemented ICP strategy have better CMR, but the odds ratio (OR) of setting SBT is higher than that of ICP on enhancing CMR. Besides, implementation of both SBT and ICP approaches can create a significant complementary or additional effect on the improvement of CMR for only firms in high carbon emission industries (HCEI). The practical implication of this study is that HCEI’s managers are advised to adopt both SBT and ICP mitigating climate change risk in an ever-evolving regulatory. Further, it is not cost-effective for non-high carbon emission industries (NHCEI) to implement both SBT and ICP simultaneously. Instead, priority setting SBT will be more appropriate for NHCEI in improving CMR. How should firms’ managers of different carbon emission attributes effectively utilize SBT and/or ICP to enhance their CMR in Japan? The aim of this study is to fill related evidences.
    關聯: Sustainable Production and Consumption 27, p.1830-1840
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025
    顯示於類別:[會計學系暨研究所] 期刊論文


    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數



    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋