English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 57064/90742 (63%)
造访人次 : 12483506      在线人数 : 179
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻

    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/118167

    题名: A Comparison of Electricity‑Pricing Programs: Economic Efficiency, Cost Recovery, and Income Distribution
    作者: Ming‑Feng Hung;Bin‑Tzong Chie;Huei‑Chu Liao
    关键词: Residential electricity;Increasing-block pricing;Efficiency;Cost recovery;Income distribution
    日期: 2019-02-23
    上传时间: 2020-03-05 12:10:54 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Springer
    摘要: This article empirically compares four electricity-pricing programs—increasing-block pricing (IBP); floating increasing-block pricing (FIBP); free market pricing (FMP); and a price-cum-trade incentive system (PTS)—in terms of efficiency, cost recovery, and income distribution by using the residential electricity data of Taiwan. The research results show that IBP and FIBP suffer from the same problem: It is hard to be cost-neutral. Further, FMP is economically efficient while favoring the electric utility over the households. PTS—which is a pricing program that satisfies the second fundamental theorem of welfare economics—shows a better ability to consider economic efficiency and equity simultaneously.
    關聯: Review of Industrial Organization 56, p.143-163
    DOI: 10.1007/s11151-019-09696-4
    显示于类别:[產業經濟學系暨研究所] 期刊論文


    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数



    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈