English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 63918/96587 (66%)
造访人次 : 3962876      在线人数 : 59
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/117416


    题名: A Perspective of Two-Level Game Reviews the Future Negotiation of Military Confidence-Building Measures in the Cross-Straits
    作者: Chan, Li-Wei
    关键词: two-level game;negotiation;Mil-CBMs
    日期: 2012-11-30
    上传时间: 2019-10-15 12:12:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Over the years, opinion polls have shown that the majority of Taiwanese support the cross-strait “status quo”. According to Putnam (1988), the result of international negotiations is subject to the consent of the nationally recognized program before being effective, unless this win-set is not satisfied with the status quo and wish to change it. Based on this, the future of cross-strait CBMs shall be subject to the public’s recognition that the win-sets is better than the status quo and their willingness to change. Although both governments have not yet specifically touched CBMs or military mutual trust mechanisms, academia, think tanks, and retired generals, including those in the U.S., have focused on these issues. The negotiations will require the interaction between the internal domestic and external conditions, or vice versa. From the point of view of policy negotiations, prior preparation and analysis work is necessary in order to build an internal consensus among policymakers. This article uses the concept of Putnam's two-level game and scenario analysis to explore the following three questions: First, regarding the cross-strait political situation, what are the preferences for “Mil-CBMs”? Second, considering the different decision-making systems, how will this affect negotiations for “Mil-CBMs”? Third, what strategic directions will both sides take toward establishing “Mil-CBMs” in future negotiations? In order to simplify the analysis of the negotiations in this case, this article does not deal with third-party intervention, such as the possibility of participating.
    显示于类别:[公共行政學系暨研究所] 會議論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML248检视/开启

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈