淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/117108
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 64191/96979 (66%)
Visitors : 8273380      Online Users : 7007
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/117108


    Title: Using propensity score adjustment method in genetic association studies
    Authors: Chattopadhyay, Amrita Sengupta;YC, Lin;Hsieh, Ai-Ru;CC, Chang;IB, Lian;SJ, Fann Cathy
    Keywords: Propensity score;Logistic regression;Single-point association test;Gene–gene interaction;Rheumatoid arthritis;Single nucleotide polymorphism
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2019-09-24 12:11:06 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: ELSEVIER
    Abstract: Background
    The statistical tests for single locus disease association are mostly under-powered. If a disease associated causal single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) operates essentially through a complex mechanism that involves multiple SNPs or possible environmental factors, its effect might be missed if the causal SNP is studied in isolation without accounting for these unknown genetic influences. In this study, we attempt to address the issue of reduced power that is inherent in single point association studies by accounting for genetic influences that negatively impact the detection of causal variant in single point association analysis. In our method we use propensity score (PS) to adjust for the effect of SNPs that influence the marginal association of a candidate marker. These SNPs might be in linkage disequilibrium (LD) and/or epistatic with the target-SNP and have a joint interactive influence on the disease under study. We therefore propose a propensity score adjustment method (PSAM) as a tool for dimension reduction to improve the power for single locus studies through an estimated PS to adjust for influence from these SNPs while regressing disease status on the target-genetic locus. The degree of freedom of such a test is therefore always restricted to 1.

    Results
    We assess PSAM under the null hypothesis of no disease association to affirm that it correctly controls for the type-I-error rate (<0.05). PSAM displays reasonable power (>70%) and shows an average of 15% improvement in power as compared with commonly-used logistic regression method and PLINK under most simulated scenarios. Using the open-access multifactor dimensionality reduction dataset, PSAM displays improved significance for all disease loci. Through a whole genome study, PSAM was able to identify 21 SNPs from the GAW16 NARAC dataset by reducing their original trend-test p-values from within 0.001 and 0.05 to p-values less than 0.0009, and among which 6 SNPs were further found to be associated with immunity and inflammation.

    Conclusions
    PSAM improves the significance of single-locus association of causal SNPs which have had marginal single point association by adjusting for influence from other SNPs in a dataset. This would explain part of the missing heritability without increasing the complexity of the model due to huge multiple testing scenarios. The newly reported SNPs from GAW16 data would provide evidences for further research to elucidate the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. PSAM is proposed as an exploratory tool that would be complementary to other existing methods. A downloadable user friendly program, PSAM, written in SAS, is available for public use.

    Graphical abstract
    The proposed propensity score adjustment method (PSAM) is a tool to improve power for single locus association studies through an estimated propensity-score (PS) by adjusting for SNPs that might be in linkage disequilibrium (LD) and/or epistatic with the target-SNP while regressing disease status on target SNP. The degree of freedom is always restricted to 1.
    Relation: Computational Biology and Chemistry 62, p.1-11
    DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2016.02.017
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute & Department of Statistics] Journal Article

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML164View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback