參與式預算之成效評估 : 以新北市政府社會局「民間培力互助‧共創幸福蘆洲」個案為例

機構典藏 > College of Business and Management > Graduate Institute & Department of Public Administration > Thesis > Item 987654321/114456

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/114456

Title:	參與式預算之成效評估 : 以新北市政府社會局「民間培力互助‧共創幸福蘆洲」個案為例
Other Titles:	Project evaluation of participatory budgeting : a case study of"collaborative social welfare program "in New Taipe City"
Authors:	蔡雪秋;Tsai, Shueh-Chiu
Contributors:	淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班李仲彬;黃婉玲;Lee, Chung-pin;Huang, Wan-Ling
Keywords:	Citizen Participation;Department of Social Welfare;operation procedure;participatory budgeting;Project Evaluation;公民參與;成效評估;參與式預算;新北市政府社會局;操作模式
Date:	2017
Issue Date:	2018-08-03 14:53:13 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	2015年是國內開始實行參與式預算（participatory budgeting，簡稱PB）的元年。國內專家學者參考臺灣各地的推動案例，雖有提出具體性的反思及建議，惟尚缺乏操作模式和實際成效之關係的研究，本研究主要目的就是透過社會福利PB操作經驗，探討其成效並提供未來參與式預算制度化的參考。經參酌國內外專家學者就PB所提出核心理念及原則，界定PB成效觀察指標分為產出面（包容、審議、培力）及執行面（行政執行經驗探討），並依其建構PB成效評估指標表。透過結構性觀察、深度訪談就本研究個案進行完整探討，發現社會福利PB操作模式，初達包容性但尚有不足、具有審議性，但仍須重視審議志工培訓及適當的討論時間、已達培力性，但須強化青年參與、須成立專責單位及強化區公所角色，並建立明確分工及彈性核銷制度。本研究最後依據上揭結論提出具體建議。本研究最主要的貢獻，即是針對行政部門推動PB提出二個具體模式建議：PB行政分工模式、PB操作模式。PB行政分工模式，建立市政府、各局處（包括議員）、區公所之明確分工；PB操作模式，建構住民大會、提案工作坊、審議工作坊、定案工作坊、提案發表、公民投票、提案執行之完整操作流程，提供一個可供複製的PB推動模式。 Participatory budgeting (PB) has becoming an important mechanism for improving the quality of democracy in Taiwan. Experts and scholars across the country evaluated PB projects implemented around the country and offered insights and constructive suggestions for improvement; still, there remains a lack of research on the outcomes of PB. This study aims to propose an implementation procedure for social welfare-based PB and to evaluate its effectiveness, in the hope that it will be useful as a reference for the institutionalization of PB in the public budgeting process. By review and discussing PB’s core values and principles, this thesis devises a two-dimensional evaluation framework of PB: output and execution. The former covers three indicators: inclusion, evaluation, and empowerment; the latter examines administrative experience in project execution. Based on the results of structured observation and in-depth interviews, this study finds that the proposed operating procedure for social welfare-based PB achieves inclusion, yet has room for further improvement; the model takes evaluation into account, but greater emphasis needs to be placed on volunteer training and the time allotted for discussion sessions; it is granted that empowerment is reached, but the role of young people should be strengthened; lastly, it is recommended that task-specific agencies, a clear division of labor and a flexible accounting procedure be established while the local district office be given a greater role. This study proposes two models as a reference for government agencies implementing PB projects: division of labor and operating procedure. The former draws a clear outline for the division of labor among city government, administrative divisions (including city council members), and district offices. The latter formulates a comprehensive and duplicable PB operating procedure that includes citizen assembly, proposal development/evaluation/finalization workshop, proposal presentation, citizen voting system, and proposal implementation and management.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute & Department of Public Administration] Thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	260	View/Open

Loading...