English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 58286/91808 (63%)
Visitors : 13830729      Online Users : 52
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/113894

    Title: 中共對臺文化戰略的解析(2008-2016) : 建構主義集體身分取向的觀點
    Other Titles: The analysis on China's culture strategy toward Taiwan (2008-2016) : aspect in collective identity of constructivism
    Authors: 李中強;Li, Chung-Chiang
    Contributors: 淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所博士班
    翁明賢;Wong, Ming-hsien
    Keywords: 建構主義;集體身分;認同;文化戰略;文化統戰;Constructivism;Collective Identity;Identity;culture strategy;Culture United Front
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2018-08-03 14:34:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣海峽兩岸的人民,同文同種、擁有相同的文化,自1949年中國內戰後分裂為兩個政治實體,雙方都宣稱中止敵對狀態,主權爭議卻是不斷。即使92年會談後有了「一個中國各自表述」的共同認知,中共對臺「不放棄武力統一」的基調卻未見調整。其近來國力大增,本可峙強大經濟實力與軍事武力發展的提升來直接對臺進行壓迫,竟不循傳統對臺文攻武嚇的模式,反而開始強調「中國人不打中國人」、「中華文化」、「兩岸同為一個民族、血脈相連」、「兩岸一家親」及「兩岸生命共同體」等說法、經濟上也大幅對臺讓利,促成「兩岸經濟合作架構協議」(ECFA)簽訂,並承認國府於抗戰時的貢獻、開放觀光、宗教、學術、文化等交流等,此與其統一臺灣一貫的戰略基調似乎有所歧異。這種發展脈絡似乎意味著在中共對臺統一戰略背後,隱藏另一個更深層的謀略。
    People who live on both sides of Taiwan Strait are the same race, using the same language and sharing the same culture. They were separated to two political entities by the civil war ended in 1949. Although both respective government claimed to terminate the cross-straits hostilities, even in 1992, Taiwan and Mainland China finally reached a “One China with respective interpretations” consensus and pursued country unification, they still have a heating debate between then regarding sovereignty.
    However after 20 years since then, not only there is no united country but also not an increasing number of Taiwan people who want to see themselves as Chinese people. They stand by Taiwan independence and maintain the status quo. Even though KMT who was in power from 1998 to 2016, the authority of Taiwan became closer to Mainland than ever before, Mainland China surrendered part of their profits to Taiwan in economy, treating Taiwan people more friendlily, communicated with each other frequency and admitting to some contribution of R.O.C government in history not too long ago.
    In this thesis, I hypothesize the P.R.C government still keeps a policy and operates culture strategy to unify Taiwan, and applied Wendt’s culture concept of constructivism as an approach to analyze the hypothesis.
    As Wendt’s theory explains, when a person’s private knowledge is shared with other people, it would become the shared knowledge. The socially shared knowledge is culture. People under the same culture would have inter-subjective understandings amongst them, and supervenience in those people’s heads to guide their behaviors. When people act out as a social role in the culture, they need other people to support the role. Therefore, if people who act out pro-social culture behavior, they would be categorized as in-group which is “Identity”. Wendt mention interdependence, common fate, homogeneity, self-restraint as four master variables to form a collective identity.
    I also propose “truth” from social cognition theory as Intervening Variable to explain why so many people in Taiwan do not want to see themselves as Chinese people and won’t unify with China after 2008?
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of International Affairs And Strategic Studies] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback