US Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy goes forward from the aspect of returning to Asia, going toward Asia and promoting the Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy as a trinity from the military, diplomatic and economic domain respectively, where we enhance alliance and build new relationship diplomatically, promote Trans-Pacific Economic Partnership Agreement economically and take military action and defense and so on; we also intervene and participate in the South China Sea disputes through the articipation in the ASEAN regional Forum; from the viewpoint of offensive realism, the main purpose of the United States, her promotion of the Asia-Pacific Rebalancing Strategy is nothing more than the rise of confining potential hegemony, avoiding CCP disengagement of the US hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region.
After the US intervention in the South China Sea disputes, the South China Sea policy turned to “some action” from the original CPC’s adherence to Deng Xiaoping''s "low profile" policy gradually. Upon taking office, Xi Jinping, on the one hand, proposed a new constructed Top-state relationship with the United States to ease the offensive US Asia-Pacific Rebalancing Strategy, on the other hand, he enhanced bilateral diplomatic and economic relationship with the ASEAN countries progressively, in an attempt to weaken the tension of the US involvement in the South China Sea dispute. The China Sea policy became taking some action from "low profile" gradually. As far as CCP are concerned, the strategic position of the South China Sea is extremely important for the United States; it is a critical field of declaring the right of free navigation. In the case of two different claims, the United States and the CPC are in a gaming contest, indicating that the South China Sea dispute is a field for the content between both countries.
In this paper, I discussed the effect of the US Asia-Pacific Rebalancing Strategy on the South China Sea regional security, and how far the South China Sea policy of CCP would go that the intensity of the intensity of US involvement in the South China Sea dispute is reduced by which means. In the offensive realism, I discussed how does the United States contain CCP by the Asia-Pacific Rebalancing Strategy, while how does the CCP contain and balance the interaction with the United States, the means they apply individually and how. Would there be any effect behind the result of interaction between them on how does CCP South China Sea policy go and develop.