English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 49194/83570 (59%)
造访人次 : 7091660      在线人数 : 43
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/111742


    题名: Vocabulary Size, Phonological Awareness, and Reading Comprehension
    作者: Sieh, Yu-cheng;薛玉政
    关键词: university learners;Chinese-L1;low reading ability;phonological awareness
    日期: 201609
    上传时间: 2017-09-01 02:10:17 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 淡江大學英文系
    摘要: The present study aimed to explore the relationship among vocabulary size, Phonological Awareness
    (PA), and reading comprehension in English learners with low proficiency in Taiwan’s higher education.
    Forty-one university students who had taken the Test of English for International Communication
    (TOEIC) were recruited, 30 of whom were at a proficiency level much lower than B1 Threshold of the
    Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) for Languages. Three PA subtests and a
    vocabulary size test were administered to all participants individually. Pearson’s correlations show that
    their TOEIC reading scores were correlated with the four measures when all 41 participants were
    included; however, among the 30 low-proficiency learners, their reading scores were correlated with
    Elision—one PA measure—and vocabulary size only. When parallel regression analyses were computed
    against all participants and the low-proficiency subgroup, the four measures altogether explained
    nearly 64% of the variance in their TOEIC reading scores in the former but the explained variance
    dropped drastically to around 40% in the latter. Among the four measures, vocabulary size was the only
    significant predictor of reading ability and accounted for the largest variance. Meanwhile,
    phonological awareness explained additional variance in reading comprehension. While different PA
    measures did not seem to make a difference to the whole sample, Elision seemed to have explained
    more variance and served as a better task to assess phonological awareness of the low-proficiency
    subgroup.
    關聯: Studies in English Language Teaching 4(3), p.299-313
    显示于类别:[英文學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈