English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62797/95867 (66%)
Visitors : 3746878      Online Users : 523
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/111526


    Title: 兩岸投資保障協議下的商務糾紛解決機制 : 以商務仲裁為核心
    Other Titles: The dispute settlement mechanism for cross-strait investment : focused on commercial arbitration
    Authors: 鍾小喬;Chung, Hsiao-Chiao
    Contributors: 淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士班
    張五岳;吳光明
    Keywords: 兩岸;商務仲裁;Cross-Strait;Commercial Arbitration
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2017-08-24 23:55:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究在兩岸簽署投資保障協議後,兩岸在商務糾紛解決機制上
    的成熟以及進步,以及在簽署此協議前後,採用之糾紛解決機制不同
    之比較以及整理。在綜觀國際間的糾紛解決機制後,運用於兩岸的可
    行性以及效果。
    隨著兩岸經貿往來的迅速發展,兩岸間的商務糾紛發生比例也隨
    之增加。海峽兩岸投資保障和促進協議於 2012 年 8 月簽署後,依據兩岸投
    保協議「商務糾紛的當事雙方可選擇兩岸的仲裁機構及當事雙方同意的仲裁
    地點」之規定,臺商和中國大陸國營企業或其他私人公司發生糾紛,當事人
    「可選擇兩岸仲裁機構」、「仲裁地點可選第三地」。
    本文主要探討兩岸商務糾紛的機制,在投保協議簽訂前後的差
    別,以及著重在兩岸投保協議中的仲裁部分,探討商務仲裁的部分,
    關於仲裁之既判力及承認等問題。而簽訂了投保協議後,在執行面上
    可能面臨哪些問題,以及簽訂後實質上的效益成果。
    本文的研究成果與主要結論為:
    第一、投保協議為兩岸特殊關係上,對於商務糾紛解決之窗口,兩岸
    的投保協議,確實比起國際間其他的投保協議來的緊密且深層。從人
    民對政府間的溝通,到政府對政府間的溝通,連成一氣的溝通管道,
    在純粹的投保協議外,更增加了,僅存於兩岸間的溝通管道與方式。
    第二、台灣對於大陸之法律、行政機構之運行,不了解部分仍多,此
    部分多為民間從事法律相關之職人士研究居多,然而兩岸關係緊密,
    因由政府主導研究,以補足建立政策時之不足。
    In this study, after the signing of Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and
    Promotion Agreement, the two sides in the dispute settlement mechanism of the
    business mature and progress, as well as before and after the signing of this
    agreement, the use of dispute mechanisms to resolve differences between
    comparative and finishing. Looking after international dispute resolution
    mechanism, applied to both sides of the feasibility and effect.
    More and more commercial disputes occurred with the rapid development of
    economics and trade cross the Strait. After entering into the Cross-Strait Bilateral
    Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement, the Straits Exchange Foundation
    immediately published that: the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion
    Agreement provides that The parties to a commercial dispute may designate an arbitration
    institution of either side of the Strait and agree on the seat of arbitration. Under such regime ,
    in the event where a dispute arises between a Taiwanese company and a Chinese state-owned
    enterprise may designate an arbitration institution of either side of the Strait and agree on the
    seat of arbitration located in a third place.
    This paper discusses the regime of cross-strait commercial disputes, the
    difference before and after the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and
    Promotion Agreement, as well as focus on cross-strait insurance agreement
    arbitration section explores some of commercial arbitration, on res judicata and
    recognition of arbitration and other issues. The signing of the Cross-Strait Bilateral
    Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement, which may face problems, as well
    as the results of the signing of substantial benefit in the implementation of the
    surface.
    Results of this study and the main conclusions are:
    First, the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement
    on cross-strait special relationship is the Solution window for commercial disputes,
    both sides of the Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion
    Agreement, indeed compared to other international insurance agreement to close and
    deep. From people of communication between the government, the government of
    intergovernmental communication, develop together communication channels,
    outside of pure agreement, adds, exists only in the channels of communication
    between the two sides and ways.
    Second, since the operation mode for Taiwan legal and administrative
    institutions of the continent it is still not understood that government agencies have
    not yet specializing in the laws of the continent, but in close cross-strait relations,
    the government should be leading the other side of the law more in-depth studies to
    complement when you create policies to be more perfect.
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML134View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback