| 摘要: | 構築文化大多從產業與地點所形成的活動累積而來，隨著時間的推移，加上許多不同條件因素的進入，在地的產業與生活習慣也開始產生變化。這變化過程都可以是構築文化的一部分，因此由地點文化至地點構築文化之轉變過程為本研究的討論目標。經由大歷史與小經驗，重新理解所謂的地域構築，並將設計視為論述的工具，試圖以地點產業文化為起點，逐步深入到地域的構築文化當中，並給予除了地方文史觀點之外，關於地點價值在設計討論上的可能性。
本研究與土地產生有趣的對話方式，可分別從活動、構築行為方式與材料的選定著手。設計方法分為兩個部分：第一是由地點目前的狀態套入社會脈絡中分析，並尋找出場所本身所累積的人文精神與價值，做為發展構築與空間計畫的基礎。第二部分則是歸納出影響構築的因子，當中包括地點客觀的條件以及地點對於構築條件的限制，以找尋出突破限制與創造新價值的契機。
在地點觀察的過程中，並不是以地點的單一現狀，做為描述地點經驗的方法，而是重視基地由過往到現今劇烈變化後所帶來改變的契機。從中藉由細緻的觀察做為連結自我知識體系的手段，並記錄下自我投射於場所內部的價值，對於連結自我經驗後所引發的情境，將成為面對構築議題時的主要依據。
在構築的議題上的分別從以下五個方面進行討論：第一是對於地點活動變遷的觀察與找尋基地內在紋理；第二是設計工具介入後，在設計方法上的經驗累積；第三是由材料使用上的邏輯，討論構築方法與地點的關係；第四是構築物與群體在進入農地，成為農業地景後所衍生的價值；第五是以設計做為整體論述推導的手段，並提出論述推導過程的設計操作手法。透過面對構築生產過程，分析整理出的邏輯思維及採用設計工具所帶來的啟發，建立起一套動態的互動模式，將構築物的表面、結構、內部空間與外部空間，以及環境上的植栽作物、使用者產生互動上的連續性，進而達到多元的環境使用。
In general, tectonic culture is an accumulation of industry activities or activities generated in certain places. Over time, various factors such as local industries and life habits begin to influence tectonic culture. This process of change can be considered a part of the tectonic culture. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to examine the transition from local culture to local tectonic culture. Both macro and micro perspectives were adopted to reinterpret local tectonic culture, while the design was adopted as a tool for discourse. The present study used local industrial culture as a starting point for discussions. These discussions were then expanded to elaborate on local tectonic culture. In addition to presenting views on local cultural history, the present study discussed the feasibility of applying local value to architectural design.
The present study developed an interesting narrative with the land, which can be approached from the aspects of activity, tectonic behavior and method, and material selection. Two methods were used for the design: (1) Discussions were based on incorporating the current status of the place into a social context of analysis, and the humanistic spirit and values accumulated at the place were identified to formulate a foundation for tectonic and spatial planning. (2) Factors that affect tectonic culture were compiled, including the objective and criteria of the place and restrictions on tectonic, thereby identifying opportunities for breakthroughs and creating new values.
The unitary status of the place was not used to describe the experiences from the site in the discussions. Rather, emphasis was placed on opportunities for change brought about by dramatic changes that the place had undergone over time. Meticulous observations were conducted to create an association with the self-knowledge system and to document the value of self-projection in a place. How this value affects the context triggered following the association of personal experience thus becomes the primary basis for examining tectonic issues.
Tectonic issues were discussed from the following five aspects: (1) observing changes in local activity and identifying the intrinsic context of the place, (2) accumulating the experiences of design following the intervention of design tools, (3) using the logics of material application to discuss the relationship between tectonic methods and place, (4) elucidating the value of tectonic objects and groups once they enter farmlands and integrate with the landscape, and (5) using design as a tool for argument and inference and proposing a design and operation method. The logic produced from the findings and the inspiration obtained from the application of the design tools were employed to develop an interactive and dynamic model. This model was then used to actuate the continuity of interaction between the surface of the tectonic constructions, internal/external spaces, potted plants, and users, thereby achieving the diversified application of environments. |
