以系統實作，來比較分析兩套辨識工具之效能:Droid以及Metadata Extraction Tool；並且以文獻探討，以學術單位之檔案文件為案例作為電子檔案版本之研究。 以實作結果歸納成果如下: 一、 目前存在的軟體版本在讀取上是沒有問題。但是在開放性上還需再多方研擬。 二、 在實測後，Droid在顯示上較為簡潔，在辨識的能力上比較寬廣。Metadata Extraction Tool在資料的儲存上比較便利，在呈現上是屬於開放式xml格式。 With system implementation, this study compares the performance of two tools for file format identification, namely, Droid and Metadata Extraction Tool. After reviewing the literatures, archive files of academic institutions were used as example to examine versions of electronic archives. 1. The existing versions of the software are good for reading archives, but more works should be done to improve the openness. 2. Our test showed that Droid is more concise in display and has a broader range of identification, while Metadata Extraction Tool is more convenient for saving data and use the xml format for display.
