English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 49645/84944 (58%)
造訪人次 : 7701585      線上人數 : 79
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/111134

    題名: 行政懲處法制之研究
    其他題名: The study of the disciplinary system for civil servants in Taiwan
    作者: 黃炳煌;Huang, Ping-Huang
    貢獻者: 淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班
    邱華君;李仲彬;Chiou, Hwa-jian;Lee, Chung-pin
    關鍵詞: 公務人員;司法懲戒;行政責任;行政懲處;一行為不二罰原則;Civil Servants;judicial punishment;administrative responsibility;administrative punishment;Double Jeopardy
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2017-08-24 23:44:50 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國公務人員違法失職行為所應負之行政責任,係採「行政懲處」及「司法懲戒」雙軌體制。前者乃各所屬機關主管長官依公務人員考績法所為之處分,後者則為公務員懲戒委員會依公務員懲戒法所為之處分;兩者皆屬對其違失行為之不利益處分。
      The punishment for the administrative responsibility of civil servants in Taiwan adopts the two-track system of“Administrative Punishment” and“Judicial Discipline”.The former is the usual assessment made according to Public Functionaries Merit Evaluation Act by the commanding officer of the government in each level, whereas the latter is the punishment made according to the Law of Disciplinary Sanctions of Public Functionaries by Commission of the Disciplinary Sanctions of Functionaries.Both ofthem are the nonbenefit punishment for the illegal and delinquency behaviors acted by civil servants.
      According to statistics: an annual average of that period 2010 to 2014 the number of administrative punishment that is approximately 175 times those of the judicial discipline.Executive director of the trend of increasing the penalties for permission, and relevant subject or administrative punishment in the form of obligations under multi uncertain legal concept of it though, is not yet a unified set of standard penalty, and considering the previous discussion of the relevant literature and the focus, mostly concentrated in the comparison of the two systems, compared with those who lack depth of study for evaluation for physical connotation of administrative punishment, etc., so conduct the study.This research is based on the reviewing of historical literature and relevant theories to review and analyze the legal and execution aspects of the present punishment system in Taiwan to discover its defects; and at the same time learn from the civil service of Germany, Japan and other countries of the discipline (punishment) system to explore, to serve whichever strengths, provide construction of the legal system to punish reference, the period in between can be "competent executive powers of punishment" and "safeguard the basic rights of civil servants" seek take equity.
      The full text is divided into six chapters, the first chapter is the exordium of the thesis. The second chapter is on the legal and practical situation of the existing administrative and judicial disciplinary punishment, to explore the legal targeting administrative punishment and its missing. The third chapter views Japan and Germany accountability mechanisms of public servants, and discusses what is worth to learn from two countries of the discipline legal system .The fourth chapter and the fifth chapter is the connotation for the "Double Jeopardy" principle and its relevant theoretical basis, the number of identified behavior problems were analyzed, to research and mention the number of acts recognized standards for the administrative punishment. The sixth chapter is the conclusion of this thesis. The substantial parts of each chapter and the result of this research will be summarized into conclusion.
    顯示於類別:[公共行政學系暨研究所] 學位論文


    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數



    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回饋