English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 52052/87180 (60%)
Visitors : 8894723      Online Users : 108
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/110708

    Title: 以障礙選擇權模型研究IFRS前後門檻的變動 : 以台灣為例
    Other Titles: Barrier option approach for threshold's change in IFRS : the case of Taiwan
    Authors: 林威廷;Lin, Wei-Ting
    Contributors: 淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班
    邱忠榮;Chiou, Jong-Rong
    Keywords: 障礙選擇權;IFRS;違約機率;KMV;Barrier Option;default probility
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2017-08-24 23:34:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文研究目的為利用障礙選擇權探討採用IFRS後對台灣上市櫃公司信用風險的影響,其障礙選擇權模型違約機率之差異。由於國內外許多文獻已證明:使用GAAP財報資料時,障礙選擇權預測公司違約風險的能力優於KMV模型,而台灣已於2013年推動新的會計準則IFRS,本文想探討其障礙選擇權的預測違約能力是否會有所改變?本文資料來源為2008年~2015年的台灣經濟新報資料庫(TEJ)的1595家公司(1377家正常營運的公司、96家曾發生財務危機的公司)。而本文研究步驟為分析台灣上市櫃公司各產業的GAAP與IFRS的障礙選擇權違約機率,並使用檢定力曲線以及Logit二元迴歸檢定各種產業的狀況。實證顯示:不論是GAAP或是IFRS的財報資料,其門檻負債比、檢定力曲線以及Logit二元迴歸都沒有明顯的差異。
    This study’s purpose is investigating the influence of credit risk and the difference of default probabilities in Taiwan by Barrier Option after IFRS was used. Many literatures had proved that Barrier Option had better performance than KMV model when using GAAP financial data to predict default risk. In 2013, Taiwan promoted new accounting principles, IFRS. Therefore, we are wondering if the predicting ability of Barrier Option will have some changes.The samples are 1595 companies’ yearly data (including 1377 normal companies and 96 companies which had financial crisis before) from 2008 to 2015. And the research steps are examining the Barrier Option default probabilities of GAAP and IFRS in Taiwan Market first, then judging the industry situations by using power curve and logistic regression model.The empirical result found that no matter the data from GAAP or IFRS, there was no obvious difference between barrier-debt ratio, power curve, and logistic regression model.
    Appears in Collections:[財務金融學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback