淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/109290
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 62822/95882 (66%)
Visitors : 4013608      Online Users : 886
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    機構典藏 > Journal of TKU > Journal of Futures Studies > v.20 n.2 >  Item 987654321/109290
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/109290


    Title: Impact Assessment and Science Fiction: Complementary Ways to Ask “What happens if…?” and the Delineation of a New Sub-genre
    Authors: Miller, Ruth-Ellen L.
    Keywords: futures studies;impact assessment;technology assessment;science fiction;nuclear power plants;Three-Mile-Island;decision-making processes;extrapolative fiction
    Date: 2015-12
    Issue Date: 2017-01-16 14:49:45 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 淡江大學未來學研究所
    Abstract: When US federal and state governments began to require environmental impact studies and technology assessments for new projects in the early 1970s, Futures Studies (FS) was the methodology of choice. Within a few years, though, criticisms of the impact assessments (IA) abounded and much of IA was considered ineffective. During the same period, science fiction (SF) was increasingly popular as a way to explore possibilities. A comparison of the two approaches shows significant similarity, with SF emphasizing human concerns and language while IAs focus on quantitative technical approaches and language. A series of t-tests resulted in no significant difference in statements of impacts in 51% of the 67 standard categories of IA between SF works that fit IA constraints and IA reports focused on the same technologies, and eight categories in which the SF had significantly more statements describing potential impacts than equivalent IAs. For the specific case of nuclear power, SF stories were more effective at predicting harmful events. These results suggest a new subgenre: SF works which fit IA constraints, called here Extrapolative Fiction (EF). Such works are recommended to be included in the IA process with suggestions for ways to do so.
    Relation: Journal of Futures Studies 20(2), pp.105-112
    DOI: 10.6531/JFS.2015.20(2).E105
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Futures Studies] v.20 n.2

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML397View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback