English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 62805/95882 (66%)
造访人次 : 3908211      在线人数 : 606
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻

    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/107444

    题名: A Comparison of Electricity-Pricing Schemes: Equity, Cost-Recovery, and Economic Efficiency
    作者: Hung, Ming-Feng;Chie, Bin-Tzong;Liao, Huei-Chu
    关键词: residential electricity;efficiency;affordability;cost recovery;consumer’s surplus;floating increasing-block pricing
    日期: 2016-06-29
    上传时间: 2016-08-18 13:41:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Electricity pricing is the main economic instrument used to charge for residential
    electricity and to manage its consumption. A regulated price in general cannot reflect
    the true value of electricity. However, a market-based electricity-pricing scheme for
    residential electricity is efficient while it is also criticized due to its unaffordability to
    the poor. This article empirically compares four electricity-pricing schemes, namely,
    increasing-block pricing (IBP), floating increasing-block pricing (FIBP), free market
    pricing (FMP), and a price-cum-trade incentive system (PTS), in terms of the aspects
    of efficiency, equity, and cost recovery by using electricity-related data for Taiwan.
    The research results show that IBP and FIBP suffer from the same problem in that it is
    hard to be cost-neutral, and FMP is economically efficient while preferring utility to
    the households. PTS performs the best, in that it can be economically efficient, as well
    as cost-neutral, and it can also improve income distribution.
    關聯: Western Economic Association International 91st Annual Conference
    显示于类别:[產業經濟學系暨研究所] 會議論文





    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈