The Comparative Perspectives of the Impacts of Political Institutions on the Incidence of Speculative Attacks

機構典藏 > College of Business and Management > Graduate Institute & Department of Public Administration > Thesis > Item 987654321/105892

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/105892

Title:	The Comparative Perspectives of the Impacts of Political Institutions on the Incidence of Speculative Attacks
Authors:	林偉修
Contributors:	淡江大學政經系
Date:	2012
Issue Date:	2016-03-04 16:10:53 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	Speculative attacks have successively occurred in the past forty years among Latin America, Europe, East Asian, Russia, Turkey, and the United States. Economists have provided explanation for the incidence of speculative attacks. They argue that inconsistent policy and incomplete information are the main causes behind the incidence of speculative attacks. All the causes are relevant to government behaviors and political economists attempt to predict governmental behaviors with political considerations. One of the most important ways to explain government behavior is partisanship. Many scholars also incorporate partisanship into their models to estimate the probability of speculative attacks. On the one hand, Leblang and Bernhard (2000) and Leblang (2003) cannot find a significant relationship between partisan government and the incidence of speculative attacks. On the other, Bussiere and Mulder (2000), and Block (2003) find a positive relationship between left governments and speculative attacks. Thus a crucial question becomes what factors have made the differences between the two findings. The main purpose of this dissertation is to address the question of partisan government and speculative attacks by looking at the interaction between political institutions and partisanship. This dissertation examines the relationship between partisan governments and speculative attacks in several steps. I develop a framework of conditional partisan politics and empirically examine the decision-making of fiscal policy, monetary policy, and exchange rate policy in conditional partisan politics. I argue that the partisan effect on macroeconomic policy is significant if the policy-making process is not transparent. Using a sample of 85 democratic countries over the period of 1990 to 2009, I empirically test my arguments for fiscal policy, monetary policy, and exchange rate policy. I find that in the political context of divided governments and parliamentary systems that lack transparency, voters are less likely to provide accountability to politicians, and partisan governments would adopt the policy consistent with their partisan goals. With these finding, I estimate the probability of speculative attacks in terms of economic models and find that the effect of partisanship on speculative attacks really depends on the design of political institutions.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute & Department of Public Administration] Thesis

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Loading...