English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 52333/87441 (60%)
Visitors : 9096739      Online Users : 295
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/105647

    Title: 都市原住民部落住宅空間研究分析 : 以南靖吉拉崮賽部落為例
    Other Titles: A study on the set tlent of Ubr an-migr anted in GaRaGouSai people : a case study in GaRaGouSai
    Authors: 孫民樺;Sun, Min-Hua
    Contributors: 淡江大學建築學系碩士班
    Keywords: 部落生活場域;住宅空間結構;阿美族傳統建築結構;Tribal living field;residential space structure;traditional architectural structure of Nanshih Amis
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-01-22 15:01:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究的目的是透過探訪近水源區的都市原住民部落,了解其部落的住宅與空間架構和傳統上的住宅與空間架構之差異。

    本研究論文的問題是 :
    1. 永久屋和安置國宅以現階段空間格局不適合用於南勢阿美族部落的生活模式,這之中差異性為何?
    2. 現代都市的生活價值觀和南勢阿美族部落的生活價值觀之差異?
    3. 經都市移居的南勢阿美族部落的整體結構是否有何改變?

    本研究方法是運用駐點觀察,記錄測繪一個選定的部落,閱讀相關文獻資料、逐戶家訪調查及運用舊史記資料來做比對,探討其中的差異性,在本研究要受訪的是南靖-吉拉箇賽部落,共49戶,241為受訪者,從訪談中釐清議題之關鍵,對於最後的研究成果共有以下三點 :

    1. 論證南勢阿美族部落的生活場域結構、住宅生活結構、部落階級和空間關係改變之分析。
    2. 以測繪紀錄的方式呈現整個部落的家屋形式和結構,透過量化的數據去論證傳統住宅空間和現代的差異點。
    3. 提出以現代都市的住宅思維模式安置都市原住民部落之問題。
    The purpose of this study was to understand the difference between residents and spatial structures of aboriginal tribes and traditional ones through visiting the urban aboriginal tribes living near the water districts.
    The tribal group located under Sanying Bridge between the Yingge District and Sanxia District faces imminent demolition due to violation of Water Act. The New Taipei City government intends to relocate the tribal residents to other locations; and adopts the permanent housing and resettlement public houses as solutions. The measures were protested by most tribal residents. The noises of rally grew louder and louder.

    The questions of this research paper are:
    1. The spatial pattern of permanent housing and resettlement public houses in the present stage is not suitable for the lifestyles of Nanshih Amis tribes. What are the major differences?
    2. What are the differences between the living values of modern cities and Nanshih Amis tribes?
    3. After the urban relocation, will there be changes in overall structure on the Nanshih Amis tribes?

    This study method employed residential on-spot observation. A tribe was selected for recording and mapping; relevant literatures were read substantially. Door visits were conducted and old historical survey data were compared with present statuses to investigate the differences. The interviewed tribe in this study was the Nanjing - Cila Kesay tribe. There were totally 49 families and 241 respondents. Key issues were being clarified. Eventually, three research results are presented as follows:

    1. Analyze Nanshih Amis tribe’s living field structure, residential living structure, tribal hierarchy and the changes in spatial relationships.
    2. Use the mapping and recording way to present the house forms and structures of the whole tribe. Demonstrate the differences between traditional residential space and modern residential space through quantitative data.
    3. The relocation of urban aboriginal tribes via thinking model of modern urban residences is proposed.
    Appears in Collections:[建築學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback