English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 49983/85139 (59%)
造访人次 : 7793365      在线人数 : 40
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/105647


    题名: 都市原住民部落住宅空間研究分析 : 以南靖吉拉崮賽部落為例
    其它题名: A study on the set tlent of Ubr an-migr anted in GaRaGouSai people : a case study in GaRaGouSai
    作者: 孫民樺;Sun, Min-Hua
    贡献者: 淡江大學建築學系碩士班
    鄭晃二
    关键词: 部落生活場域;住宅空間結構;阿美族傳統建築結構;Tribal living field;residential space structure;traditional architectural structure of Nanshih Amis
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2016-01-22 15:01:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究的目的是透過探訪近水源區的都市原住民部落,了解其部落的住宅與空間架構和傳統上的住宅與空間架構之差異。
    位於鶯歌區與三峽區間的三鶯大橋下之部落群,因水利法問題面臨拆遷,政府有意將部落居民遷至他處安置,沿用永久屋及安置國宅作為解決方式,但這遭到多數部落居民抗議,反彈的聲浪越演越大。

    本研究論文的問題是 :
    1. 永久屋和安置國宅以現階段空間格局不適合用於南勢阿美族部落的生活模式,這之中差異性為何?
    2. 現代都市的生活價值觀和南勢阿美族部落的生活價值觀之差異?
    3. 經都市移居的南勢阿美族部落的整體結構是否有何改變?

    本研究方法是運用駐點觀察,記錄測繪一個選定的部落,閱讀相關文獻資料、逐戶家訪調查及運用舊史記資料來做比對,探討其中的差異性,在本研究要受訪的是南靖-吉拉箇賽部落,共49戶,241為受訪者,從訪談中釐清議題之關鍵,對於最後的研究成果共有以下三點 :

    1. 論證南勢阿美族部落的生活場域結構、住宅生活結構、部落階級和空間關係改變之分析。
    2. 以測繪紀錄的方式呈現整個部落的家屋形式和結構,透過量化的數據去論證傳統住宅空間和現代的差異點。
    3. 提出以現代都市的住宅思維模式安置都市原住民部落之問題。
    The purpose of this study was to understand the difference between residents and spatial structures of aboriginal tribes and traditional ones through visiting the urban aboriginal tribes living near the water districts.
    The tribal group located under Sanying Bridge between the Yingge District and Sanxia District faces imminent demolition due to violation of Water Act. The New Taipei City government intends to relocate the tribal residents to other locations; and adopts the permanent housing and resettlement public houses as solutions. The measures were protested by most tribal residents. The noises of rally grew louder and louder.

    The questions of this research paper are:
    1. The spatial pattern of permanent housing and resettlement public houses in the present stage is not suitable for the lifestyles of Nanshih Amis tribes. What are the major differences?
    2. What are the differences between the living values of modern cities and Nanshih Amis tribes?
    3. After the urban relocation, will there be changes in overall structure on the Nanshih Amis tribes?

    This study method employed residential on-spot observation. A tribe was selected for recording and mapping; relevant literatures were read substantially. Door visits were conducted and old historical survey data were compared with present statuses to investigate the differences. The interviewed tribe in this study was the Nanjing - Cila Kesay tribe. There were totally 49 families and 241 respondents. Key issues were being clarified. Eventually, three research results are presented as follows:

    1. Analyze Nanshih Amis tribe’s living field structure, residential living structure, tribal hierarchy and the changes in spatial relationships.
    2. Use the mapping and recording way to present the house forms and structures of the whole tribe. Demonstrate the differences between traditional residential space and modern residential space through quantitative data.
    3. The relocation of urban aboriginal tribes via thinking model of modern urban residences is proposed.
    显示于类别:[建築學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML65检视/开启

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈