English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51931/87076 (60%)
Visitors : 8477020      Online Users : 128
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/105630

    Title: 外包與層狀加勁礫石樁軸向載重行為之數值分析比較
    Other Titles: Comparative study on axial stress of encased and laminated granular columns using numerical analysis
    Authors: 林冠廷;Lin, Guan-Ting
    Contributors: 淡江大學土木工程學系碩士班
    Keywords: 地工合成材;層狀加勁;外包加勁;數值模擬;砂樁;geosynthetic;Laminated reinforced;Encased reinforced;numerical modeling;sand column
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-01-22 15:01:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究使用數值分析方式,模擬試驗砂土及加勁材之力學行為。以軸對稱方式,建立加勁砂柱之數值模型,並利用程式FLAC進行分析,分別模擬實驗室之外包及層狀加勁砂柱之力學行為。確立模式正確性後,依現地砂樁尺寸與加勁材料,分析此兩種加勁方式在相同加勁材用量時,軸向承載行為之差異與加勁效能。

    分析結果獲得無論是外包或層狀加勁,當樁徑愈小或加勁材勁度愈大,加勁材所提供之圍束應力愈大,柱體可承受之軸向壓力也愈大,對柱體腫脹之抑制效果愈佳。一般加勁材勁度的情況下(100-1000 kPa),層狀加勁所提供的軸向承載壓力優於外包形式;但若採用極高勁度加勁材(5000 kPa),且於較大的軸應變下,則外包加勁形式可提供較大的軸向壓力。此外,層狀加勁之加勁材與砂土間的界面摩擦角,也將明顯影響加勁礫石樁的軸向承載壓力。
    The purpose of this study is to compare the mechanical behavior of encased and laminated granular columns using a numerical method. The numerical analysis is performed using the finite difference program FLAC. An axial symmetrical model is used based on elastic-plastic constitutive model with non-associated flow rule. Numerical analysis results are verified via laboratory triaxial tests on encased/laminated sand columns. The reinforcement stiffness, strength and diameter of the granular column in the field influence reinforced columns response is also studied. Based on the same amount of reinforcement, the axial bearing capacity is compared for the both reinforced types.

    Parametric studies on the column diameter, an increase in the reinforcement stiffness or a decrease in the column diameter might obtain greater axial bearing pressure and inhibit column bulging due to increase of confining pressure in the soil mass for the both of type reinforced columns. The bearing capability for a laminated reinforced column is greater than an encased column as same amount of reinforcement under general reinforcement stiffness (100-1000 kPa). However, the encased column might cause higher capability as using the high-stiffness (5000 kPa) reinforcement under larger axial strain. The interfacial friction angle may cause slippage to occur early for laminated reinforced columns. Therefore, a reinforced column with lower interfacial friction angle achieves lower strength.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback