淡江大學機構典藏:Item 987654321/105550
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 62805/95882 (66%)
造访人次 : 3988344      在线人数 : 614
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/105550


    题名: 考慮分類號結構為主的圖書借閱推薦方法
    其它题名: Subject-code-based book recommendation method
    作者: 鄭皓澤;Tey, Haw-Zhe
    贡献者: 淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士班
    魏世杰;Wei, Shih-Chieh
    关键词: 圖書借閱推薦;圖書分類號;協同推薦;分類號相似度;Book Borrowing Recommendation;Library Catalogue Subject Code;Collaborative Recommendation;Subject Code Similarity
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2016-01-22 14:58:54 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 分類表是具體而微的人類知識表徵，其類目設計與結構的一致性具有一定的公信力，但透過探勘借閱行為發現許多相關書籍並沒有歸在同一分類號層級中。由於圖書分類號代表書籍的知識領域類別，故借閱者借閱某書可視為其對某分類號代表的知識領域有偏好。傳統協同推薦中，所推薦出的清單可能含有用戶未偏好的書籍。基於上述原因，本文在過去研究的人推薦物內嵌物推薦物架構上，分別加入圖書分類號協同相似度、圖書分類號固有相似度、同儕熱門度之考量，以觀察其對提升圖書推薦系統的效果。結果發現圖書分類號協同相似度搭配圖書分類號固有相似度在意外性表現最好，Top-N精確率以圖書分類號協同相似度、圖書分類號固有相似度、同儕熱門度的組合最顯著，整體精確率則以圖書分類號依字典排序距離、圖書分類號固有相似度、同儕熱門度的組合最佳。
    The library catalogue classification system is a characterization of human knowledge which contains a consistent and credible design of hierarchical subject codes. But through mining of borrowing behavior, it is found that many relevant books do not belong to the same subject code. As each subject classification code represents a certain category of knowledge domain, when a user borrows a book, it means that he has preference for the book’s knowledge domain. In traditional collaborative recommendation, the recommended list may contain books the user dislikes. Due to the above reasons, based on a past framework which allows item-to-item recommendation embedded in user-to-item recommendation, this work considers subject code collaborative similarity, subject code native similarity, and peer popularity to improve the recommendation. Our experimental results show that in terms of unexpectedness, recommendation using subject code collaborative similarity and subject code native similarity performs the best. In terms of top-n precision, recommendation using subject code collaborative similarity, subject code native similarity and peer popularity performs the best. In terms of average precision, recommendation using subject code lexicographic distance, subject code native similarity and peer popularity performs the best.
    显示于类别:[資訊管理學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML94检视/开启

    在機構典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - 回馈