English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 51254/86278 (59%)
Visitors : 8002522      Online Users : 178
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library & TKU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/105426


    Title: 象徵互動論 : 以會計師對專業注意與責任之解讀分析審計期望落差
    Other Titles: Symbolic Interactionism : from CPA's perspective to analyze the auditing expectation gap in due professional care and responsibilities
    Authors: 施佑璇;Shih, Yu-Shyuan
    Contributors: 淡江大學會計學系碩士班
    林谷峻;Lin, Ku-Jun
    Keywords: 審計期望落差;專業注意義務;象徵互動論;Auditing Expectation Gap;Due Professional Care;Symbolic Interactionism
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-01-22 14:55:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 專業注意義務是一個抽象的定義,執業會計師行使專業判斷並非僅是一個刺激產生一個反應的重複行為,而是其心靈、自我與社會互動的一個過程。根據象徵互動論,會計師由這些社會互動給予的意義,自我判讀建立對於專業注意的觀點,概化其觀點而產生專業行為。由於互動至行為之間的觀點建立關乎於詮釋,本文認為會計師對「專業注意義務」之詮釋乃影響實際作為與社會評價間產生的審計期望落差之主要因素。本研究採用象徵互動論學者之主張設計訪談內容,透過與執業會計師深入訪談的方式進行研究,了解會計師在決策過程中可能面臨的決策困境或特殊經驗,從中觀察會計師在這些互動中是如何建立觀點,自我之觀點影響行使專業判斷的反應行為。研究結果將有助於我們分析會計師在扮演查核人員之角色時,若與社會觀感不同,所產生審計期望落差的形成原因。
    Certified Public Accounts (CPAs) perform due Professional Care in their services. It is not a repeated behavior that caused by stimulation, but an interactive process combined with CPAs themselves and the society. According to the symbolic Interactionism, professional behavior is triggered by CPAs’ acknowledgement and interpretation toward standpoints in due professional care, while the standpoints are established through their interaction with the society. Since those standpoints are based on CPA’s interpretation, we believe that their interpretation in " Due Professional Care " is the main factor that causes the expectation gap between their actual behavior and social evaluation. The study demonstrate the dilemma when CPAs enter into decision-making process and shows how they establish their standpoints in due professional care through their experience, acknowledgement and interpretation. The result explains the causes of the audit expectation gap.
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系暨研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML35View/Open

    All items in 機構典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library & TKU Library IR teams. Copyright ©   - Feedback